Clinical Trial Intelligence

How Long Do Phase III Neurology CTIS Reviews Take and What Predicts Delay?

19 July 2026

Across 247 Phase III neurology trials, the median end-to-end European Union Clinical Trials Information System (EU CTIS) timeline was 97 days (SD 41.6). The 1,018 country-specific Part II decisions had a similar median of 99.5 days, but a far wider SD of 243.8 days: 535 of 1,018 decisions (52.6%) concluded within 120 days, while 324 (31.8%) exceeded 365 days. Country, Part II submission month, site footprint, paediatric status, disease, modality and operational complexity showed the clearest associations with timing.

Trials analysed247Phase III neurology trials
EU CTIS end-to-end97 daysMedian · SD 41.6
Country Part II99.5 daysMedian · SD 243.8 · n=1,018
Long-tail Part II31.8%324 of 1,018 exceeded 365 days

How long do the two CTIS review clocks take?

End-to-end timing runs from the initial EU CTIS submission to the first trial authorisation and is therefore a trial-level European measure, not a country metric. Part II timing runs from each country’s Part II submission to its latest country decision or authorisation and is the only timeline reported by country.

Overall timing distributions

EU CTIS end-to-end
97
median days · n=247
  • SD 41.6
  • Middle 50%: 36.5–115.5
  • Range: 6–188
Country-specific Part II
99.5
median days · n=1,018
  • SD 243.8
  • Middle 50%: 27–437.8
  • Range: 0–861
SD = standard deviation. Part II dispersion is 5.9× the end-to-end SD.
Interpretation

The two medians are nearly identical, but country Part II has a much heavier tail: its 75th percentile is 437.8 days versus 115.5 days for end-to-end EU CTIS authorisation.

What percentage of decisions finish within common planning intervals?

EU CTIS end-to-end authorisation accelerates sharply between 90 and 120 days: the cumulative completion rate rises from 117 of 247 trials (47.4%) to 210 of 247 (85.0%). Country Part II decisions rise only from 491 of 1,018 (48.2%) to 535 of 1,018 (52.6%) over the same interval.

EU CTIS end-to-end
Within 30 days42 / 247 (17.0%)
Within 60 days98 / 247 (39.7%)
Within 90 days117 / 247 (47.4%)
Within 120 days210 / 247 (85.0%)
Within 180 days246 / 247 (99.6%)
Country-specific Part II
Within 30 days290 / 1,018 (28.5%)
Within 60 days444 / 1,018 (43.6%)
Within 90 days491 / 1,018 (48.2%)
Within 120 days535 / 1,018 (52.6%)
Within 180 days574 / 1,018 (56.4%)
Within 365 days694 / 1,018 (68.2%)
Bars are cumulative: each interval includes all decisions completed on or before that day.
Interpretation

A 120-day planning assumption captures 85.0% of first EU CTIS authorisations but only 52.6% of Part II country decisions. Even a 365-day Part II assumption captures 68.2%, leaving 31.8% beyond one year.

How long does country-specific CTIS Part II take?

Among countries with at least five decisions, Finland had the shortest Part II median at 24.5 days (n=12), followed by Denmark and Estonia at 27 days. Latvia had the longest median at 252 days (n=7), followed by Belgium at 226.5 and Spain at 196.5 days.

All country Part II decisions · sorted by median days

CountrynMedianSD
Cyprus114
Finland1224.5243.2
Denmark4927207.9
Estonia627228.8
Norway1631.5260.8
Lithuania733264.2
Ireland1036.5222.1
Austria2447.5243.7
Sweden2647.5252.9
Czechia3949228.5
Slovakia2356209.0
Bulgaria2367237.4
Hungary3277.5233.3
Slovenia678.5290.8
Romania2196252.5
Netherlands5699.5252.7
Greece26101.5220.8
France113122233.7
Croatia14148283.2
Italy113148252.2
Portugal38165.5253.0
Germany97168255.2
Poland93181246.3
Spain112196.5249.1
Belgium54226.5243.6
Latvia7252202.1
Days from the earliest country Part II submission to the latest country decision or authorisation. Cyprus has one decision; its SD is not estimable.
Interpretation

Country selection materially changes expected Part II timing. The median gap between Finland and Latvia is 227.5 days, while large SDs of 202.1–290.8 days in many countries show that the median should be paired with a long-tail contingency.

Which factors track faster or slower end-to-end EU CTIS approval?

The clearest end-to-end associations were operational scale and complexity. Trials with 31+ EU sites had a median of 112 days versus 69 days for trials with ≤10 sites; digital-recruitment trials had a median of 112 versus 70 days without digital recruitment.

Initial EU CTIS submission month · median end-to-end days

Jun · n=2040.5days
Sep · n=2045days
Oct · n=3058.5days
May · n=1782days
Jul · n=3588days
Apr · n=1895days
Feb · n=14101.5days
Jan · n=13104days
Aug · n=13105days
Mar · n=21105days
Dec · n=31118days
Nov · n=15122days
Month is analysed without using submission year. Values are descriptive associations, not causal effects.

Selected end-to-end correlates

EU site footprint

≤10 sites · n=10769 days≥90 days: 46.7%
31+ sites · n=61112 days≥90 days: 70.5%

Design

Non-randomised · n=7475.5 days≥90 days: 45.9%
Randomised · n=173103 days≥90 days: 57.2%

Recruitment operations

No digital recruitment · n=17870 days≥90 days: 46.1%
Digital recruitment · n=69112 days≥90 days: 73.9%

Eligibility burden

≤10 criteria · n=7382 days≥90 days: 47.9%
21+ criteria · n=81104 days≥90 days: 60.5%

EU country scope

1 country · n=9587 days≥90 days: 47.4%
5+ countries · n=96107.5 days≥90 days: 59.4%
Interpretation

The strongest practical signal is scale: 43 of 61 trials with 31+ sites (70.5%) took at least 90 days, compared with 50 of 107 trials with ≤10 sites (46.7%). Complex recruitment also clustered with delay: 51 of 69 digital-recruitment trials (73.9%) and 26 of 34 advocacy-recruitment trials (76.5%) took at least 90 days.

What correlates with country Part II delay?

Country Part II timing was most sensitive to submission month, participant population and local operational burden. November submissions had a median of 35 days, while December submissions had a median of 437 days; paediatric trial-country decisions had a median of 290 days versus 67 days for adult trials.

Country Part II submission month · median days

Nov · n=5735days
Oct · n=10640days
Jun · n=10542days
Mar · n=9369days
Sep · n=8676.5days
Jul · n=9497days
Aug · n=9898days
Jan · n=94121.5days
Apr · n=91250days
Feb · n=64299days
May · n=87354days
Dec · n=43437days
Month is analysed without submission year. December: 34 of 43 decisions (79.1%) took ≥90 days; November: 18 of 57 (31.6%).

Selected Part II correlates

Participant population

Adult trials · n=69767 days≥90 days: 47.1%
Paediatric trials · n=321290 days≥90 days: 62.6%

Country site footprint

≤2 sites · n=40277 days≥90 days: 48.5%
3–5 sites · n=294141 days≥90 days: 55.1%

Masking

Open-label · n=44880.5 days≥90 days: 48.4%
Blinded / non-open · n=570139.5 days≥90 days: 54.7%

Sponsor type

Non-industry · n=13062 days≥90 days: 47.7%
Industry · n=888104 days≥90 days: 52.6%

Treatment structure

No combination · n=87296.5 days≥90 days: 51.3%
Combination · n=146141.5 days≥90 days: 56.2%
Interpretation

Paediatric status was the largest cross-trial operational signal: 201 of 321 paediatric Part II decisions (62.6%) took ≥90 days versus 328 of 697 adult decisions (47.1%). Local site expansion also increased the median from 77 days at ≤2 sites to 141 days at 3–5 sites.

Do neurological disease and treatment modality matter?

Disease and modality patterns differed between the European first-authorisation clock and country Part II. Multiple-sclerosis/demyelinating trials had the shortest end-to-end median at 50 days, yet their country Part II median was 186 days. Epilepsy Part II was longest at 300.5 days, while stroke was 42 days.

End-to-end by neurological disease group
GroupnMedian≥90d
Multiple sclerosis / demyelinating355040.0%
Other neurology6264.541.9%
Stroke / cerebrovascular258748.0%
Migraine / headache20103.560.0%
Movement disorders16104.575.0%
Epilepsy / seizure2110861.9%
Alzheimer’s / dementia2311273.9%
Neuromuscular / motor neuron28113.557.1%
Rare / neurodevelopmental911666.7%
End-to-end by modality
GroupnMedian≥90d
Gene / cell therapy113345.5%
Mixed / other316332.3%
Antibody-containing596947.5%
Protein / peptide2310360.9%
Small molecule only12310461.8%
Median = days; ≥90d = proportion taking at least 90 days.
Part II by neurological disease group
GroupnMedian≥90d
Stroke / cerebrovascular714233.8%
Movement disorders434530.2%
Alzheimer’s / dementia904637.8%
Neuromuscular / motor neuron1986644.4%
Rare / neurodevelopmental3088.550.0%
Migraine / headache86113.555.8%
Multiple sclerosis / demyelinating19318658.0%
Other neurology204238.559.8%
Epilepsy / seizure96300.571.9%
Part II by modality
GroupnMedian≥90d
Mixed / other892733.7%
Protein / peptide768148.7%
Antibody-containing35093.551.1%
Small molecule only47915356.4%
Gene / cell therapy2420154.2%
Groups reflect the principal disease and modality categories present in the trial records.
Interpretation

Modality is not uniformly predictive across both clocks. Gene/cell therapy was fastest end-to-end at 33 days (n=11) but slowest in Part II at 201 days (n=24 country decisions); small-molecule trials were 104 days end-to-end and 153 days in Part II.

What should teams use for EU CTIS planning?

The overall median is a useful baseline, but country-specific Part II requires a portfolio approach because the upper tail is much longer than the end-to-end EU CTIS clock.

Base EU plan
97 daysMedian to first EU CTIS authorisation.
High-confidence EU plan
120 daysCovered 210 of 247 trials (85.0%).
Part II upper quartile
437.8 days75% of country decisions were at or below this point.
Part II extreme tail
31.8%324 of 1,018 country decisions exceeded 365 days.
Planning implication

Use 97 days as the central EU CTIS estimate and 120 days as an 85% first-authorisation benchmark. Build country Part II plans separately, using each country median and SD, and add the largest contingency for paediatric, epilepsy, multi-site and late-year Part II submissions.

Definitions

EU CTIS end-to-end: initial EU CTIS submission to first CTIS authorisation; one value per trial and not attributable to individual countries.

Country-specific Part II: earliest Part II submission in a country to its latest decision or authorisation; one value per trial-country.

SD: standard deviation, used with the median to show the spread and long tail of review times.