Clinical Trial Intelligence

How Long Do Phase III Gastroenterology CTIS Reviews Take and What Shapes Delay?

19 July 2026

Across 153 Phase III gastroenterology trials, the median end-to-end EU CTIS submission-to-first-authorisation timeline was 83 days (SD 39.5). Country-specific CTIS Part II decisions had a median of 102 days (SD 226.6), with major differences between countries and long right-tail delays. Shorter timelines clustered around May, August and October submissions, single-country footprints, small-molecule programmes and trials without CRO or digital-recruitment infrastructure; mixed modalities and operationally complex programmes had the highest ≥90-day rates.

Trials included
153
Phase III gastroenterology EU CTIS submissions
End-to-end median
83 days
SD 39.5; interquartile range 36–112 days
Country Part II median
102 days
595 country-level decisions; SD 226.6
Strongest delay signal
81.8%
Digital-recruitment trials requiring ≥90 days

What is the end-to-end EU CTIS review time?

End-to-end time—initial EU CTIS submission to first CTIS authorisation—was 83 days at the median and 39.5 days by standard deviation. Of 153 trials, 31 (20.3%) were authorised within 30 days, 60 (39.2%) within 60 days, 82 (53.6%) within 90 days and 140 (91.5%) within 120 days.

Cumulative trials authorised by day threshold
Within 30 days
20.3%
31 of 153 trials
Within 60 days
39.2%
60 of 153 trials
Within 90 days
53.6%
82 of 153 trials
Within 120 days
91.5%
140 of 153 trials
25th percentile
36 d
Median
83 d
75th percentile
112 d
End-to-end EU CTIS timeline; n=153 trials. Country-level values are not used for this measure.
Interpretation

A 90-day planning assumption covers only 53.6% of Phase III gastroenterology EU submissions. A 120-day regulatory buffer is materially more reliable, covering 91.5%.

How long does country-specific CTIS Part II take?

Across 595 country-level CTIS Part II decisions, the median was 102 days and the standard deviation was 226.6 days. The distribution was strongly right-skewed: the 25th percentile was 23 days and the 75th percentile was 399.5 days.

Country-specific Part II decisions by day threshold
Within 30 days
33.1%
197 of 595 country decisions
Within 60 days
47.1%
280 of 595 country decisions
Within 90 days
48.9%
291 of 595 country decisions
Within 120 days
53.3%
317 of 595 country decisions
Within 180 days
58.7%
349 of 595 country decisions
CTIS Part II is country-specific. End-to-end EU submission time is reported only at trial level.
Interpretation

Only 47.1% of country-specific Part II decisions were completed within 60 days. The high SD and 399.5-day upper quartile show that country sequencing and long-tail national decisions can materially outlast the first EU authorisation.

Which countries are fastest and slowest for CTIS Part II?

Among countries with at least eight observations, Slovakia (24 days), Austria (25), Croatia (28) and Norway (33.5) had the shortest median Part II timelines. France had the longest high-volume median at 214 days, followed by Spain at 147, Bulgaria at 141, Germany at 127.5 and Poland at 120.5 days.

CTIS Part II country ranking — fastest median first
Country n Median d SD Relative median
Latvia 3 21 51.7
Slovakia 14 24 171.1
Austria 19 25 173.3
Croatia 8 28 142.2
Norway 12 33.5 207.8
Sweden 14 34.5 260.9
Lithuania 8 36 195.1
Netherlands 32 46.5 251.9
Czechia 26 54.5 209.5
Hungary 30 55 163.5
Romania 17 55 176.1
Finland 4 70.5 91.3
Belgium 47 72 236.1
Denmark 16 77 144.3
Portugal 21 94 230.2
Italy 47 106 258.3
Greece 15 113 218.9
Poland 48 120.5 219.4
Germany 54 127.5 225.6
Bulgaria 20 141 222.9
Spain 53 147 222.3
Slovenia 2 198 240.4
France 77 214 263.2
Estonia 2 289.5 395.3
Ireland 6 456.5 224.6
Country values represent CTIS Part II only; SD = standard deviation. End-to-end EU CTIS time is not assigned to individual countries.

Does submission month correlate with EU CTIS speed?

Month was one of the clearest timing signals. May, August and October submissions had a combined median of 40 days; 34 of 53 (64.2%) were faster than the overall median and 18 of 53 (34.0%) required at least 90 days. March, April, September, November and December had a combined median of 106 days; only 18 of 55 (32.7%) were faster than the median and 35 of 55 (63.6%) required at least 90 days.

Median end-to-end days by month of EU CTIS submission
Jan
n=7
89 d
Feb
n=4
54 d
Mar
n=9
101 d
Apr
n=13
104 d
May
n=19
42 d
Jun
n=15
81 d
Jul
n=19
61 d
Aug
n=14
33 d
Sep
n=13
99 d
Oct
n=20
48.5 d
Nov
n=9
113 d
Dec
n=11
117 d
Faster cluster Slower cluster Intermediate
Analysis uses month only; submission year is excluded.
Interpretation

May, August and October submissions were 1.53 times as likely to finish below the overall median as other months. December had the longest monthly median at 117 days and the highest ≥90-day share at 72.7%.

Do countries, sites and sample size affect review time?

The number of participating countries—not the total number of sites or participants—showed the clearest trial-footprint association with end-to-end EU CTIS time. Country count had a weak positive correlation with review duration (Spearman ρ=0.17; p=0.035), while total sites had essentially no correlation (ρ=−0.02; p=0.829).

EU country footprint
GroupnMedian<83 d≥90 d
0–1 countries 86 71 57.0% 38.4%
2–6 countries 28 105.5 39.3% 60.7%
7+ countries 39 102 41.0% 56.4%
Total site footprint
GroupnMedian<83 d≥90 d
0–5 sites 50 87 46.0% 46.0%
6–25 sites 53 77 50.9% 47.2%
26+ sites 50 75 52.0% 48.0%
Part II increases with sites within a country
0–1 sites
54.0%
Median days; n=96
2–5 sites
96.0%
Median days; n=264
6+ sites
159.0%
Median days; n=192
Country-site count correlated positively with Part II duration (ρ=0.13; p=0.0016). Median Part II time rose from 54 days with 0–1 sites to 159 days with 6+ sites.
Interpretation

Adding countries was more consistently associated with end-to-end delay than adding sites. At national level, however, higher site burden correlated with slower Part II decisions—suggesting that country activation complexity matters after the EU submission enters local review.

Which diseases, modalities and designs correlate with delay?

Disease-area differences were smaller than modality and design differences. Mixed-modality programmes had a 101.5-day median and 30 of 46 (65.2%) required at least 90 days, versus 68 days and 23 of 59 (39.0%) for small-molecule-only trials. Randomised trials had a 91-day median and 52.7% ≥90-day rate, compared with 70 days and 31.7% for non-randomised trials.

End-to-end EU CTIS by disease group
Disease groupnMedian d<83 d≥90 d
Upper GI disease 7 58 57.1% 42.9%
GI oncology 38 81 50.0% 44.7%
Liver & biliary disease 29 81 51.7% 41.4%
Acute/surgical GI 10 84 50.0% 50.0%
Inflammatory bowel disease 52 88 48.1% 50.0%
Other gastroenterology 17 99 47.1% 52.9%
Modality profile
ModalitynMedian d<83 d≥90 d
Small molecule 59 68 61.0% 39.0%
Monoclonal antibody 28 96 46.4% 50.0%
Mixed modalities 46 101.5 28.3% 65.2%
Other modality 11 49 63.6% 36.4%
Unspecified 9 70 77.8% 11.1%
Randomised
91 days
59/112 (52.7%) ≥90 days
Non-randomised
70 days
13/41 (31.7%) ≥90 days
Interpretation

Mixed modalities and randomised designs were stronger delay markers than the underlying gastroenterology disease group. Mixed-modality trials were 1.66 times as likely to exceed 90 days as all other modality profiles.

Which operational factors signal substantial CTIS delay?

Digital recruitment, CRO involvement and industry sponsorship were the strongest operational associations with ≥90-day EU CTIS review. These characteristics commonly co-occur in larger, multinational and operationally complex programmes, so they should be interpreted as complexity signals rather than causal delay mechanisms.

Digital recruitment
115 d
27/33 (81.8%) ≥90 days
RR 2.18 vs no digital recruitment
CRO present
106.5 d
44/72 (61.1%) ≥90 days
RR 1.77 vs no CRO
Industry sponsor
103.5 d
46/82 (56.1%) ≥90 days
RR 1.53 vs non-industry
Signals of below-median review
No CRO: 49/81 (60.5%) below 83 days
Non-industry sponsor: 44/71 (62.0%)
Small molecule only: 36/59 (61.0%)
0–1 countries: 49/86 (57.0%)
May/Aug/Oct: 34/53 (64.2%)
Signals of ≥90-day delay
Digital recruitment: 27/33 (81.8%)
Mixed modalities: 30/46 (65.2%)
CRO present: 44/72 (61.1%)
2+ countries: 39/67 (58.2%)
Slow calendar months: 35/55 (63.6%)
Interpretation

The most useful planning signal is cumulative complexity. A multinational, randomised, mixed-modality programme using CRO and digital-recruitment infrastructure should be budgeted toward the 90–120+ day range, while simpler single-country submissions are materially more likely to finish below the 83-day median.

Definitions

End-to-end EU CTIS time: days from initial CTIS submission to first CTIS authorisation at trial level.
CTIS Part II: country-specific days from the earliest Part II submission to the latest national decision or authorisation recorded for that country.
Below median: fewer than 83 end-to-end days.
Substantial delay: at least 60 days; severe delay analysis uses at least 90 days.
SD: standard deviation. RR: unadjusted risk ratio. Associations do not establish causality.