How Long Do Phase II Infectious Disease CTIS Reviews Take and What Drives Delay?
Clinical Trial Intelligence

How Long Do Phase II Infectious Disease CTIS Reviews Take and What Drives Delay?

20 July 2026

Across 109 Phase II infectious disease trials, the median CTIS EU submission timeline was 91 days end to end with an observed SD of 40.9 days. Country specific CTIS Part II review was longer and more variable at 153.5 median days with an SD of 209.6 days. Multi country submissions and larger site footprints were the clearest trial level markers of long end to end review, while country, open label design, orphan status, and scale differentiated Part II delay.

Trials
109
Phase II infectious disease CTIS EU submissions
End to end
91 days
Median; observed SD 40.9 days
Part II
153.5 days
Country median; observed SD 209.6 days
Three months plus
61.2%
148 of 242 Part II decisions took at least 90 days

What is the CTIS EU submission timeline end to end?

The end to end measure applies to the complete CTIS EU submission, not to individual countries. Median authorization was 91 days and SD was 40.9 days. Approvals accumulated sharply between 90 and 120 days: 54 of 109 trials (49.5%) were approved within 90 days, rising to 92 of 109 (84.4%) within 120 days.

Cumulative authorizations by elapsed days
Within 30 days
18.3%
20 of 109 trials
Within 60 days
34.9%
38 of 109 trials
Within 90 days
49.5%
54 of 109 trials
Within 120 days
84.4%
92 of 109 trials
Within 180 days
100.0%
109 of 109 trials
End to end = initial CTIS EU submission to first authorization.
At least 60 days
65.1%
71 of 109 EU submissions
At least 90 days
51.4%
56 of 109 EU submissions
At least 120 days
16.5%
18 of 109 EU submissions
Interpretation

The operational planning point is not 60 days. Half of Phase II infectious disease submissions had not received first authorization by 90 days, but the large majority cleared by 120 days.

How does CTIS Part II vary by country?

Country results refer only to CTIS Part II. Across 242 country decisions, the pooled median was 153.5 days. Among countries with at least two observations, Norway had the shortest median at 30 days, followed by Portugal at 54.5 days and the Netherlands at 71 days. Ireland had the longest median at 519 days, followed by Greece at 413.5 days and Austria at 318 days.

Shortest multi observation medians
Norway 30 days, n=3
Portugal 54.5 days, n=2
Netherlands 71 days, n=11
Longest multi observation medians
Ireland 519 days, n=3
Greece 413.5 days, n=8
Austria 318 days, n=4
Country specific Part II processing time in days
Country n Median SD
Slovenia 1 20 0.0
Slovakia 1 29 0.0
Norway 3 30 111.0
Iceland 1 52 0.0
Portugal 2 54.5 0.5
Latvia 1 55 0.0
Netherlands 11 71 171.8
Spain 38 102 221.3
Poland 13 105 270.4
Denmark 12 105.5 156.0
Romania 7 111 176.9
Hungary 7 117 205.0
Germany 22 127.5 231.0
Czechia 8 146.5 106.0
Finland 2 149 35.0
Belgium 16 160.5 184.8
Italy 25 169 196.4
Bulgaria 11 176 168.9
Sweden 11 188 277.4
France 34 210 208.6
Austria 4 318 152.0
Croatia 1 383 0.0
Greece 8 413.5 176.2
Ireland 3 519 166.2
Observed population SD; a country with one observation has an observed SD of 0.
Interpretation

Country choice creates a larger timing spread than the overall EU submission measure. The difference between the fastest and slowest multi observation country medians was 489 days.

What proportion of CTIS Part II decisions clear within common planning intervals?

Only 77 of 242 Part II decisions (31.8%) cleared within 60 days and 94 of 242 (38.8%) within 90 days. The pooled median was crossed between 120 and 180 days, and 56 of 242 decisions (23.1%) still required at least 365 days.

Cumulative Part II decisions by elapsed days
Within 30 days
17.8%
43 of 242 country decisions
Within 60 days
31.8%
77 of 242 country decisions
Within 90 days
38.8%
94 of 242 country decisions
Within 120 days
46.7%
113 of 242 country decisions
Within 180 days
55.0%
133 of 242 country decisions
Within 365 days
76.9%
186 of 242 country decisions
Two months plus
68.6%
166 of 242 Part II decisions took at least 60 days
Three months plus
61.2%
148 of 242 Part II decisions took at least 90 days
Six months plus
45.0%
109 of 242 Part II decisions took at least 180 days
Interpretation

A 60 or 90 day Part II assumption would cover only a minority of country decisions. A portfolio plan needs country specific buffers rather than one EU wide Part II target.

Which operational factors track with faster or slower end to end authorization?

Shorter than median means under 91 days. Single country submissions had a median of 83 days versus 104.5 days for multi country submissions. Trials with five or fewer sites had a median of 84 days versus 105 days above five sites. Country count correlated with duration at Spearman ρ=0.27, and site count at ρ=0.34.

Country footprint
Single country shorter than median
56.7%
38 of 67 trials
Multi country shorter than median
38.1%
16 of 42 trials
Single country at least 120 days
7.5%
5 of 67 trials
Multi country at least 120 days
31.0%
13 of 42 trials
Site footprint
Five sites or fewer shorter than median
56.9%
33 of 58 trials
Above five sites shorter than median
41.2%
21 of 51 trials
Five sites or fewer at least 120 days
5.2%
3 of 58 trials
Above five sites at least 120 days
29.4%
15 of 51 trials
Interpretation

Multi country trials had 5.6 times the odds of reaching 120 days compared with single country trials, while trials above five sites had 7.6 times the odds compared with smaller site footprints. Target sample size was not materially correlated with end to end duration, with Spearman ρ=0.03.

Does CTIS EU submission month matter?

Month of initial CTIS EU submission showed a wide descriptive spread. Among months with at least five trials, March had the shortest median at 44.5 days and May the longest at 111 days, a difference of 66.5 days. March also placed 7 of 8 trials (87.5%) below the overall median, compared with 1 of 6 (16.7%) in May.

Median days by initial submission month
Jan
81 d
n=8
Feb
94 d
n=9
Mar
44.5 d
n=8
Apr
87.5 d
n=8
May
111 d
n=6
Jun
96 d
n=8
Jul
65 d
n=10
Aug
32 d
n=3
Sep
97 d
n=14
Oct
110 d
n=21
Nov
36 d
n=5
Dec
69 d
n=9
Month comparisons pool all observed submissions and do not include year as an analytical factor.
Interpretation

March was consistently favorable in this cohort, while May, June, September, and October clustered near or above the overall median. Month is best treated as a planning signal rather than a causal driver.

Which diseases and modalities were associated with delay?

At disease group level, HIV trials had a median end to end time of 71 days, compared with 108 days for bacterial infections and 109 days for viral hepatitis. At modality level, mixed modality trials had a median of 69 days, small molecules and vaccines each 89 days, and peptide, protein, or enzyme trials 111 days.

Disease groups
Group n Median 120d plus
HIV 25 71 16.0%
Other infectious disease 15 79 6.7%
Fungal infections 6 79.5 16.7%
COVID and coronaviruses 12 81 0.0%
Other viral infections 8 85.5 0.0%
CMV and transplant infections 6 98 33.3%
Bacterial infections 26 108 26.9%
Viral hepatitis 11 109 27.3%
Modalities with at least five trials
Modality n Median 120d plus
Mixed modality 19 69 0.0%
Small molecule 57 89 15.8%
Vaccine 15 89 13.3%
Peptide/protein/enzyme 6 111 33.3%
Interpretation

Bacterial infection and viral hepatitis programs were approximately five weeks slower at the median than HIV programs. Peptide, protein, or enzyme trials also showed the highest 120 day delay rate among modality groups with at least five trials at 33.3%.

Which factors were associated with country specific Part II delay?

For Part II, shorter than median means under 153.5 days. Randomised trials had a median of 111 days versus 185 days for non randomised trials. Open label trials had a median of 185.5 days versus 110 days for blinded or not open label trials. Orphan programs reached a median of 185.5 days and 15 of 18 decisions (83.3%) took at least 90 days.

Design
Randomised at least 90 days
55.1%
81 of 147 decisions
Not randomised at least 90 days
70.5%
67 of 95 decisions
Blinded or not open label at least 90 days
52.9%
64 of 121 decisions
Open label at least 90 days
69.5%
82 of 118 decisions
Program complexity
Non orphan at least 90 days
59.4%
133 of 224 decisions
Orphan drug at least 90 days
83.3%
15 of 18 decisions
Target sample 80 or fewer at least 90 days
58.1%
72 of 124 decisions
Target sample above 80 at least 90 days
64.4%
76 of 118 decisions
Open label effect
2.28×
Odds of at least 90 days versus blinded or not open label
Orphan effect
3.68×
Odds of at least 90 days versus non orphan
Site count relation
ρ = 0.17
Country sites versus Part II days
Interpretation

Part II delay was primarily country and program specific. Open label and orphan programs showed higher 90 day delay odds, while larger target samples and more country sites shifted medians upward. These are exploratory associations and should not be interpreted as causal.

What should sponsors plan for in Phase II infectious disease CTIS submissions?

The data support three planning rules: use approximately 120 days as the high coverage end to end authorization horizon; model Part II separately by country; and treat multi country or larger site footprints as elevated risk for 120 day plus end to end review. A single 60 or 90 day assumption materially understates the observed Part II tail.

EU submission
Plan to 120 days to cover 84.4% of observed first authorizations.
Part II
Use country medians and SDs; 45.0% of decisions required at least 180 days.
Risk control
Reduce initial country and site footprint where sequencing is operationally possible.
Definitions

CTIS means Clinical Trials Information System. End to end is initial CTIS EU submission to first authorization and is not country specific. Part II is the country specific review component. SD is the descriptive population standard deviation of observed values. Shorter than median means under 91 days for end to end and under 153.5 days for Part II.