Clinical trial • Phase II/III • Immunology
BIRCH POLLEN ALLERGOID GLUTARALDEHYDE MODIFIED for Allergic rhinitis due to birch pollen | Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis
Phase II/III trial of BIRCH POLLEN ALLERGOID GLUTARALDEHYDE MODIFIED for Allergic rhinitis due to birch pollen | Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.
Overview
- Trial Therapeutic Area
- Immunology
- Trial Disease
- Allergic rhinitis due to birch pollen | Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis
- Trial Stage
- Phase II/III
- Drug Modality
- Vaccine
Key dates
- Initial CTIS Submission Date
- 30-01-2025
- First CTIS Authorization Date
- 11-04-2025
Trial design
Randomised, placebo preparation for subcutanoues use with appearance, smell, taste and excipients identical to verum, but without the active substance; clu-rx-bet low dose (birch pollen allergoid glutaraldehyde modified) - solution for injection, subcutaneous use; clu-rx-bet mid dose (birch pollen allergoid glutaraldehyde modified) - solution for injection, subcutaneous use; clu-rx-bet high dose (birch pollen allergoid glutaraldehyde modified) - solution for injection, subcutaneous use. product-level dosing details available: max daily dose 0.7 ml; max total dose 6.2 ml; exact dosing schedule not specified in ctis record.-controlled Phase II/III trial across 3 sites in Germany.
- Randomised
- Yes
- Comparator
- Placebo preparation for subcutanoues use with appearance, smell, taste and excipients identical to verum, but without the active substance; CLU-RX-BET low dose (birch pollen allergoid glutaraldehyde modified) - solution for injection, subcutaneous use; CLU-RX-BET mid dose (birch pollen allergoid glutaraldehyde modified) - solution for injection, subcutaneous use; CLU-RX-BET high dose (birch pollen allergoid glutaraldehyde modified) - solution for injection, subcutaneous use. Product-level dosing details available: max daily dose 0.7 ml; max total dose 6.2 ml; exact dosing schedule not specified in CTIS record.
- Single Multiple Or Escalation Dose Combined
- Yes
- Target Sample Size
- 660
Eligibility
Recruits 660 No vulnerable populations selected. Participants must be adults able to provide written informed consent (Patients who signed and dated the informed consent form obtained prior to any study specific examination). 'Legal incapacity' and institutionalisation are listed as exclusion criteria. Participants must be able to understand and complete an electronic diary; assent processes are not applicable because enrolment is restricted to adults (18-65 years)..
- Pregnancy Exclusion
- Existing or intended pregnancy, lactation or inadequate contraceptive measures for women with child-bearing potential or a positive pregnancy test at screening
- Vulnerable Population
- No vulnerable populations selected. Participants must be adults able to provide written informed consent (Patients who signed and dated the informed consent form obtained prior to any study specific examination). 'Legal incapacity' and institutionalisation are listed as exclusion criteria. Participants must be able to understand and complete an electronic diary; assent processes are not applicable because enrolment is restricted to adults (18-65 years).
Inclusion criteria
- {"criterion_text":"- Patients who signed and dated the informed consent form obtained prior to any study specific examination\n- Female or male patients between 18 and 65 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent form\n- Patients with moderate-to-severe allergic rhinitis / rhinoconjunctivitis due to birch pollen for at least two years according to the Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guideline (Bousquet et al., 2008), with well-controlled mild-to-moderate asthma defined in GINA guidelines (Global Initiative for Asthma, 2024), or without asthma\n- Forced expiratory volume (FEV1) in one second > 80 % of predicted normal value (only for asthmatic patients)\n- Sensitization to Betula verrucosa pollen, verified by: positive skin prick test (wheal diameter ≥ 3 mm and negative control < 2 mm and positive (histamine) control ≥ 3 mm) and serum allergen-specific IgE to Betula verrucosa ≥ 0.7 kU/L (CAP EAST class ≥ 2) and a Retrospective Rhinitis Total Symptom Score (RRTSS) ≥ 2 (0-3 scale) based on the most severe days during one of the two BPS preceding enrolment and positive response to nasal provocation with Betula verrucosa pollen allergen extract (at least at the third concentration step)\n- Assumed compliance and ability of the patient to understand the patient´s electronic diary and to follow the instructions of the study staff\n- Compliance and ability of the patient to complete an electronic diary for self-evaluation of the symptoms and rescue medication\n- Safety laboratory results within the normal range or considered to be not clinically significant in any other case"}
Exclusion criteria
- {"criterion_text":"- Previous immunotherapy with birch pollen allergen extracts according to the homologous group of tree pollen of the \"Birch group\" / “Fagales group”, as defined in Annex 1 in the Guideline on allergen products: production and quality issues (EMEA/CHMP/BWP/304831/2008), within the last 5 years\n- Serious systemic reactions to allergen-specific immunotherapy in the past\n- Hypersensitivity to excipients of the IMP\n- Any severe or unstable lung disease e. g. active tuberculosis, cystic fibrosis, COPD\n- Severe, or partly controlled or uncontrolled asthma according to GINA guideline (Global Initiative for Asthma, 2024)\n- Asthmatic patients with FEV1 ≤ 80 % of predicted normal value at screening\n- Chronic or severe acute diseases of nose or eyes\n- Irreversible secondary disorders of the target organs (e. g. emphysema, bronchiectasis)\n- Therapy with immunoglobulins\n- Completed or ongoing treatment with anti-IgE-antibody (like Omalizumab) and/or checkpoint-inhibitor\n- Diseases of the immune system including autoimmune and immune deficiencies (with exception to well-controlled Hashimoto thyroiditis and type-1 diabetes mellitus)\n- Patients with co-sensitizations or co-allergies to any perennial or seasonal allergen (with exception of alder, hazel and hornbeam), which interfere with the conduct of the study (e. g. with the tNPT or CSMS recording), especially if the result in SPT for this allergen is higher than that for Betula verrucosa\n- Severe acute or chronic inflammatory or infectious diseases\n- Chronic or acute diseases of the heart, kidney or liver with severe impairment of their function\n- Malignancy within the previous 5 years\n- Active chronic urticaria\n- Active severe atopic eczema\n- Alcohol, drug, or medication abuse within the past year and/or during the study\n- Existing or intended pregnancy, lactation or inadequate contraceptive measures for women with child-bearing potential or a positive pregnancy test at screening\n- Systemic and local (eye drops) treatment with beta-blockers\n- Use of non-allowed medication\n- Contraindication for adrenalin (for example, acute or chronic symptomatic coronary heart disease, severe hypertension, hyperthyroidism, glaucoma)\n- Patients with co-sensitizations to any perennial or seasonal allergen overlapping during PBPP or BPS but which are not cross-reactive with Betula verrucosa and, measured at the same time, with specific IgE levels ≥ class 2 CAP/PHADIA (unless the relevance can be excluded by component resolved diagnosis)\n- Severe psychiatric, psychological, or neurological disorders; completed or ongoing longterm treatment with tranquilizer or psychoactive drugs (including tricyclic anti-depressants)\n- Relationship or dependence with the sponsor and/or investigator\n- Legal incapacity\n- Patients who are jurisdictional or governmentally institutionalized\n- Risk of non-compliance by the patient with the study procedures\n- Simultaneous participation in other clinical trials\n- Simultaneous specific immunotherapy with other allergens\n- Participation, meaning randomization, in a clinical trial in the last three months before enrolment\n- Contraindications for SCIT (Pfaar et al., 2022; Pitsios et al., 2015)\n- Contraindications for SPT\n- Contraindications for NPT"}
Endpoints
Primary endpoints
- {"endpoint_text":"- The primary (efficacy) endpoint is defined as the absolute differences in mean CSMS (Combined Symptom and Medication Score) during Peak Birch Pollen Period (PBPP) of each active treatment group compared with placebo treatment group.","definition_or_measurement_approach":"Absolute differences in mean Combined Symptom and Medication Score (CSMS) during the Peak Birch Pollen Period (PBPP) comparing each active treatment group with placebo."}
Secondary endpoints
- {"endpoint_text":"- Absolute and relative differences in mean CSMS during the Birch Pollen Season (BPS) between active and placebo treatment groups.","definition_or_measurement_approach":"Comparison of absolute and relative differences in mean CSMS during the full Birch Pollen Season between active and placebo groups."}
- {"endpoint_text":"- Absolute and relative differences in mean dSS during PBPP and BPS.","definition_or_measurement_approach":"Comparison of absolute and relative differences in mean daily Symptom Score (dSS) during PBPP and BPS."}
- {"endpoint_text":"- Absolute and relative differences in the 6 mean individual symptom scores (4 nasal and 2 ocular) during PBPP and BPS.","definition_or_measurement_approach":"Comparison of absolute and relative differences in the six individual symptom scores (four nasal, two ocular) during PBPP and BPS."}
- {"endpoint_text":"- Absolute and relative differences in mean dMS during PBPP and BPS.","definition_or_measurement_approach":"Comparison of absolute and relative differences in mean daily Medication Score (dMS) during PBPP and BPS."}
- {"endpoint_text":"- Global Rhinoconjunctivitis Discomfort with a 10.0-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).","definition_or_measurement_approach":"Global discomfort measured using a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)."}
- {"endpoint_text":"- Change in Rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire (RQLQ) between active and placebo treatment groups comparing basal and post-treatment scoring.","definition_or_measurement_approach":"Change from baseline to post-treatment in RQLQ scores comparing active versus placebo groups."}
- {"endpoint_text":"- Well and severe days: A well day is defined as a day without administration of any rescue medication (dMS = 0) and with dSS < 0.34 (range 0-3). A severe day is defined (acc. to Pfaar et al., 2014) as a day with a single score = 3 in any of the six symptoms. Percentages of well and severe days will be calculated for each subject as the number of well or severe days in the PBPP and BPS in relation to the number of days comprising both periods.","definition_or_measurement_approach":"Well day: dMS = 0 and dSS < 0.34. Severe day: any single symptom score = 3. Percentages of well and severe days computed per subject for PBPP and BPS."}
- {"endpoint_text":"- Symptom-free days during PBPP and PBP are defined as the days with absence of symptoms, (dSS = 0), and without administration of any rescue medication (dMS = 0), expressed as percentage of days during the PBPP and BPS.","definition_or_measurement_approach":"Symptom-free days: dSS = 0 and dMS = 0; expressed as percentage of days in PBPP and BPS."}
- {"endpoint_text":"- tNPT titrated Nasal Provocation Test: To assess the efficacy of each dose of CLURX- BET compared to placebo. Defined as percentage of patients with an increased dosing step and the change in number of dosing steps needed to provoke a positive response in the titrated nasal provocation test (tNPT) post-treatment compared with pre-treatment (i. e. any improvement) in each of the four study groups.This is based on the change of the response to nasal provocation (tNPT)","definition_or_measurement_approach":"tNPT: percentage of patients with increased dosing step post-treatment vs pre-treatment and change in number of dosing steps required to provoke a positive response."}
- {"endpoint_text":"- To analyse the safety and tolerability of each dose of CLU-RX-BET compared to placebo by Treatment-Emergent Adverse Drug Reactions (TEADR) and patients affected with TEADRs in each group.","definition_or_measurement_approach":"Safety/tolerability assessed by incidence and nature of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Drug Reactions (TEADRs) and number of patients affected per group."}
Recruitment
- Planned Sample Size
- 660
- Recruitment Window Months
- 25
- Consent Approach
- Written informed consent: 'Patients who signed and dated the informed consent form obtained prior to any study specific examination' (adults 18-65). Participants must be able to understand and complete an electronic diary; no assent procedures described (trial restricted to adults). Languages of consent documents not specified in CTIS record.
Geography
- Total Number Of Sites
- 3
- Total Number Of Participants
- 660
Germany
- Earliest CTIS Part Ii Submission Date
- 28-03-2025
- Latest Decision Or Authorization Date
- 11-04-2025
- Processing Time Days
- 14
- Number Of Sites
- 3
- Number Of Participants
- 40
Sites
- Site Name
- Praxis für HNO und Allergologie Dr. Yury Yarin
- Department Name
- HNO, Allergology
- Principal Investigator Name
- Dr. Yury Yarin
- Principal Investigator Email
- dr.yarin@googlemail.com
- Contact Person Name
- Dr. Yury Yarin
- Contact Person Email
- dr.yarin@googlemail.com
- Site Name
- HNO-Praxis Dr. med. Udo Schäfer
- Department Name
- HNO, Allergology
- Principal Investigator Name
- Dr. Udo Schäfer
- Principal Investigator Email
- schaefer@hno-praxis-dresden.de
- Contact Person Name
- Dr. Udo Schäfer
- Contact Person Email
- schaefer@hno-praxis-dresden.de
- Site Name
- Pneumologie, Allergologie Praxis Dr. Thomas Ginko
- Department Name
- Pulmonary and bronchial medicine, allergology
- Principal Investigator Name
- Dr. Thomas Ginko
- Principal Investigator Email
- tginko@icloud.com
- Contact Person Name
- Dr. Thomas Ginko
- Contact Person Email
- tginko@icloud.com
Sponsor
Primary sponsor
- Full Name
- ROXALL Medizin GmbH
- Organisation Type
- Pharmaceutical company
- Country Of Registered Address
- Germany
Third parties
- {"country":"Germany","full_name":"ICRC-Weyer GmbH","duties_or_roles":"sponsorDuties codes: 10, 6","organisation_type":"Pharmaceutical company"}
Investigational products
- Investigational Product Name
- CLU-RX-BET low dose
- Active Substance
- BIRCH POLLEN ALLERGOID GLUTARALDEHYDE MODIFIED
- Modality
- Vaccine
- Routes Of Administration
- Subcutaneous
- Route
- Subcutaneous
- Authorisation Status
- Authorised
- Dose Levels
- low dose
- Maximum Dose
- max daily dose 0.7 ml; max total dose 6.2 ml
- Investigational Product Name
- CLU-RX-BET mid dose
- Active Substance
- BIRCH POLLEN ALLERGOID GLUTARALDEHYDE MODIFIED
- Modality
- Vaccine
- Routes Of Administration
- Subcutaneous
- Route
- Subcutaneous
- Authorisation Status
- Authorised
- Dose Levels
- mid dose
- Maximum Dose
- max daily dose 0.7 ml; max total dose 6.2 ml
- Investigational Product Name
- CLU-RX-BET high dose
- Active Substance
- BIRCH POLLEN ALLERGOID GLUTARALDEHYDE MODIFIED
- Modality
- Vaccine
- Routes Of Administration
- Subcutaneous
- Route
- Subcutaneous
- Authorisation Status
- Authorised
- Dose Levels
- high dose
- Maximum Dose
- max daily dose 0.7 ml; max total dose 6.2 ml
- Investigational Product Name
- Placebo preparation for subcutanoues use with appearance, smell, taste and excipients identical to verum, but without the active substance, i. e. allergen extract.
- Modality
- Other
Related trials
Other published trials that may interest you.
- BETULA POLLEN EXTRACT for Allergic rhinitis due to birch pollen | Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis
- BELIMUMAB for Antibody-mediated rejection (kidney transplant)|High HLA sensitization (transplant candidates)
- Belimumab for Systemic lupus erythematosus
- INEBILIZUMAB for Myasthenia gravis
- PREDNISONE for Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener's) | Microscopic polyangiitis | ANCA-associated vasculitis