Clinical trial • Phase IV • Other
LEVOBUPIVACAINE for Labour (epidural analgesia)
Phase IV trial of LEVOBUPIVACAINE for Labour (epidural analgesia).
Overview
- Trial Therapeutic Area
- Other
- Trial Disease
- Labour (epidural analgesia)
- Trial Stage
- Phase IV
- Drug Modality
- Small molecule
Key dates
- Initial CTIS Submission Date
- 28-05-2025
- First CTIS Authorization Date
- 29-08-2025
Trial design
Randomised, control arm: epidural analgesia using the epidural technique with dural puncture and epidural infusion of levobupivacaine 0.125% + fentanyl (fentanyl dose not specified in ctis record). experimental arm: epidural analgesia using the epidural technique with dural puncture and epidural infusion of levobupivacaine 0.0625% + fentanyl (fentanyl dose not specified). Phase IV trial across 1 site in Spain.
- Randomised
- Yes
- Comparator
- Control arm: Epidural analgesia using the epidural technique with dural puncture and epidural infusion of levobupivacaine 0.125% + fentanyl (fentanyl dose not specified in CTIS record). Experimental arm: Epidural analgesia using the epidural technique with dural puncture and epidural infusion of levobupivacaine 0.0625% + fentanyl (fentanyl dose not specified).
- Target Sample Size
- 534
Eligibility
Recruits 534 Participants are pregnant women. CTIS indicates isVulnerablePopulationSelected = false. Consent requirements in inclusion/exclusion: "Able to provide written informed consent, or have a legal representative who can provide it." and "Freely accepts participation in the study and gives written informed consent obtained in accordance with international guidelines and local legislation." No assent procedures or additional vulnerable-population consent procedures are described..
- Pregnancy Exclusion
- Pregnant women who do not achieve a sufficient level of analgesia and experience epidural analgesia failure 50 minutes after the initiation of the technique, due to the absence of any sensory and/or motor block or its lateralization, secondary to incorrect catheter placement outside the epidural space or laterally within it, requiring a new neuraxial technique.
- Vulnerable Population
- Participants are pregnant women. CTIS indicates isVulnerablePopulationSelected = false. Consent requirements in inclusion/exclusion: "Able to provide written informed consent, or have a legal representative who can provide it." and "Freely accepts participation in the study and gives written informed consent obtained in accordance with international guidelines and local legislation." No assent procedures or additional vulnerable-population consent procedures are described.
Inclusion criteria
- {"criterion_text":"- Primiparous pregnant women in labor either spontaneously or by induction of labor, presenting in both cases cervical dilatation > 3 cm upon admission to the dilatation room (1st active phase of labor).\n- Able to provide written informed consent, or have a legal representative who can provide it.\n- Able to understand the nature of the study and related procedures, as well as to comply with them.\n- Freely accepts participation in the study and gives written informed consent obtained in accordance with international guidelines and local legislation."}
Exclusion criteria
- {"criterion_text":"- Second parturients or history of more vaginal deliveries.\n- Any other condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the evaluation of the results of the study.\n- IMC >40 kg/m2.\n- Contraindications for the epidural technique (neurological pathology, hemostasis alterations, refusal of the patient to receive epidural analgesia).\n- Accidental dural puncture.\n- The patient presents any condition or situation that prevents or interferes with compliance with the study protocol.\n- The patient has a significant underlying disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, could prevent or alter her participation in the study.\n- Any other condition that, in the opinion of the researcher, may interfere with the evaluation of the results of the study.\n- Pregnant women who do not achieve a sufficient level of analgesia and experience epidural analgesia failure 50 minutes after the initiation of the technique, due to the absence of any sensory and/or motor block or its lateralization, secondary to incorrect catheter placement outside the epidural space or laterally within it, requiring a new neuraxial technique."}
Endpoints
Primary endpoints
- {"endpoint_text":"- Presence of incomplete sensory block, defined as a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score greater than 3 (VAS >3) at 45 minutes after the initiation of epidural analgesia. This will be recorded as a dichotomous variable (Yes/No).","definition_or_measurement_approach":"Measured using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 45 minutes after initiation of epidural analgesia; endpoint recorded dichotomously as Yes/No for VAS >3."}
Secondary endpoints
- {"endpoint_text":"- Pain assessment through comparison of mean VAS scores: before performing the technique, at 30 minutes, 60 minutes, during the expulsive phase, and prior to manual epidural reinforcement. (Score 0–10: 0–4 cm mild pain; 5–7 cm moderate pain; 8–10 cm severe pain).","definition_or_measurement_approach":"Mean VAS (0–10) measured at specified timepoints (baseline, 30 min, 60 min, expulsive phase, prior to manual reinforcement) and compared between groups."}
- {"endpoint_text":"- Epidural analgesia failure requiring the performance of a new technique (new technique: Yes/No). Incidence of failure in the conversion from epidural analgesia to epidural anesthesia for intrapartum cesarean section, requiring a new technique, either neuraxial or general anesthesia (failure: Yes/No; new technique: Yes/No; type: sedation, spinal, epidural, combined, general anesthesia).","definition_or_measurement_approach":"Recorded incidence of epidural analgesia failure requiring a new anaesthetic technique; capture whether failure occurred and type of new technique (sedation, spinal, epidural, combined, general anesthesia)."}
- {"endpoint_text":"- APGAR at 1 minute and 5 minutes (whole numbers from 1-10) pH in cord blood (number) Lactic acid in cord blood (mmol/L) Admission to NICU (Y/N).","definition_or_measurement_approach":"Neonatal outcomes: APGAR scores at 1 and 5 minutes, cord blood pH, cord blood lactic acid (mmol/L), and NICU admission (Yes/No)."}
- {"endpoint_text":"- Assessment of motor block using the Bromage scale at 30 minutes, 60 minutes and expulsion, and Bromage prior to manual epidural reinforcement. Frequency of postural changes and ambulation time in minutes. Type of delivery. Indication of caesarean section if necessary and degree of urgency according to Lucas classification.","definition_or_measurement_approach":"Motor block assessed via Bromage scale at specified times; record postural change frequency, ambulation time (minutes), delivery type, and caesarean indication/urgency (Lucas classification)."}
- {"endpoint_text":"- Degree of satisfaction using the BSS-RI scale (Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised Indicator, score 0-12, attached document). Prolonged epidural block >24h (hours). Urinary retention. Other complications.","definition_or_measurement_approach":"Maternal satisfaction measured with BSS-RI (score 0–12); record prolonged epidural block >24 hours, urinary retention, and other complications."}
- {"endpoint_text":"- Number of epidural boluses administered via PCEA (Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia) and manually requested (in whole numbers: 1, 2, 3…). Failure of PCEA reinforcement (Yes/No). Episodes of breakthrough pain, defined as VAS >3, prior to achieving adequate epidural analgesia, requiring manual reinforcement (in whole numbers: 1, 2, 3…). Administration of paracetamol (Yes/No).","definition_or_measurement_approach":"Record number of PCEA and manual boluses, PCEA reinforcement failure (Yes/No), episodes of breakthrough pain (VAS >3) requiring manual reinforcement (counts), and paracetamol administration (Yes/No)."}
Recruitment
- Planned Sample Size
- 534
- Recruitment Window Months
- 6
- Consent Approach
- Written informed consent required. Inclusion criteria state: "Able to provide written informed consent, or have a legal representative who can provide it." and "Freely accepts participation in the study and gives written informed consent obtained in accordance with international guidelines and local legislation." A subject information and informed consent form document is listed in the CTIS documents. No assent procedures or specific languages for consent documents are specified in the record.
Geography
- Total Number Of Sites
- 1
- Total Number Of Participants
- 534
Spain
- Earliest CTIS Part Ii Submission Date
- 02-07-2025
- Latest Decision Or Authorization Date
- 29-08-2025
- Processing Time Days
- 58
- Number Of Sites
- 1
- Number Of Participants
- 534
Sites
- Site Name
- Hospital Universitario La Paz
- Department Name
- Anestesiología y Reanimación
- Principal Investigator Name
- Isabel Valbuena Gómez
- Principal Investigator Email
- isabel.valbuena@salud.madrid.org
- Contact Person Name
- Isabel Valbuena Gómez
- Contact Person Email
- isabel.valbuena@salud.madrid.org
- Number Of Participants
- 534
Sponsor
Primary sponsor
- Full Name
- Hospital Universitario La Paz
- Organisation Type
- Hospital/Clinic/Other health care facility
- Country Of Registered Address
- Spain
Investigational products
- Investigational Product Name
- Levobupivacaína NORMON 0,625 mg/ml solución para perfusión EFG
- Active Substance
- LEVOBUPIVACAINE
- Modality
- Small molecule
- Routes Of Administration
- Epidural infusion (as used in trial); product also listed for infusion
- Route
- Epidural infusion
- Authorisation Status
- Authorised
- Starting Dose
- 0.0625% (trial experimental concentration)
- Maximum Dose
- 0.06 % (product record maxTotalDoseAmount with doseUomTotal "% percent")
- Investigational Product Name
- Levobupivacaína NORMON 1,25 mg/ml solución para perfusión EFG
- Active Substance
- LEVOBUPIVACAINE
- Modality
- Small molecule
- Routes Of Administration
- Epidural infusion (as used in trial); product also listed for infusion
- Route
- Epidural infusion
- Authorisation Status
- Authorised
- Starting Dose
- 0.125% (trial control concentration)
- Maximum Dose
- 0.12 % (product record maxTotalDoseAmount with doseUomTotal "% percent")
- Investigational Product Name
- Fentanest 0,05 mg/ml solución inyectable
- Active Substance
- FENTANYL CITRATE
- Modality
- Small molecule
- Routes Of Administration
- Epidural (co-administered in trial arms); product listed as injection
- Route
- Epidural/injection
- Authorisation Status
- Authorised
- Maximum Dose
- 20 µg (product record maxTotalDoseAmount with doseUomTotal "µg microgram(s)")
- Investigational Product Name
- Ropivacaína B. Braun 2 mg/ml solución inyectable y para perfusión EFG
- Active Substance
- ROPIVACAINE HYDROCHLORIDE
- Modality
- Small molecule
- Routes Of Administration
- Solution for injection/infusion (product record)
- Route
- Injection/infusion
- Authorisation Status
- Authorised
- Maximum Dose
- 30 mg (product record maxTotalDoseAmount with doseUomTotal "mg milligram(s)")
- Combination Treatment
- Yes
Related trials
Other published trials that may interest you.