Clinical Trial Intelligence

Which EU/EEA Sites Lead Ophthalmology Phase II/III Trials?

15 June 2026

Across 95 ophthalmology Phase II/III trials, the dataset maps 1,684 European site allocations and 10,122 planned participants across 23 countries. Hospital Universitario Virgen De La Macarena leads the site ranking with 19 distinct trial participations, while Spain is the largest national capacity pool with 303 sites and 2,016 planned participants. Retina-heavy indications dominate: neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD), geographic atrophy/dry AMD, and diabetic macular edema account for 996 of 1,684 sites (59.1%).

Trials
95
Unique Phase II/III ophthalmology trials
Site allocations
1,684
Country-level planned site footprint
Participants
10,122
Planned participant allocations
Countries
23
EU/EEA trial country footprint

Which sites appear most often in Phase II/III ophthalmology trials?

The top-ranked site is Hospital Universitario Virgen De La Macarena, appearing in 19 of 95 trials (20.0%). Budapest Retina Associates follows with 18 trials (18.9%), while five institutions each appear in 17 trials (17.9%), showing a tight tier of repeat ophthalmology site contributors.

Top 10 sites by distinct trial participations
Hospital Universitario Virgen De La Macarena
19 trials · 20.0%
Spain; 6 disease clusters
Budapest Retina Associates Kft.
18 trials · 18.9%
Hungary; 6 disease clusters
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Paris
17 trials · 17.9%
France; 8 disease clusters
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
17 trials · 17.9%
Italy; 6 disease clusters
Ospedale San Raffaele S.r.l.
17 trials · 17.9%
Italy; 6 disease clusters
Universitaetsklinikum Tuebingen AöR
17 trials · 17.9%
Germany; 9 disease clusters
University Of Debrecen
17 trials · 17.9%
Hungary; 6 disease clusters
Universitaetsklinikum Bonn AöR
16 trials · 16.8%
Germany; 6 disease clusters
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire De Dijon
15 trials · 15.8%
France; 5 disease clusters
Centre Monticelli Paradis D Ophtalmologie
15 trials · 15.8%
France; 4 disease clusters
Measure: number of unique trial codes in which the site appears.
Interpretation

The leading repeat sites are concentrated in Spain, Hungary, France, Italy, and Germany. This suggests that late-stage ophthalmology site selection is not only driven by large university hospitals; high-throughput retina-specialist organizations also form a recurring operational backbone.

Which countries carry the largest ophthalmology trial footprint?

Spain, Germany, France, Italy, and Poland account for 1,231 of 1,684 site allocations (73.1%). Spain leads both site footprint and participant allocation, with 303 sites (18.0%) and 2,016 planned participants (19.9%).

Top countries by site allocations
Spain
303 sites · 18.0%
50 trials; 2,016 planned participants
Germany
267 sites · 15.9%
51 trials; 1,440 planned participants
France
259 sites · 15.4%
44 trials; 1,261 planned participants
Italy
232 sites · 13.8%
41 trials; 1,439 planned participants
Poland
170 sites · 10.1%
30 trials; 905 planned participants
Hungary
128 sites · 7.6%
21 trials; 612 planned participants
Czechia
64 sites · 3.8%
18 trials; 595 planned participants
Greece
37 sites · 2.2%
8 trials; 254 planned participants
Slovakia
37 sites · 2.2%
8 trials; 203 planned participants
Austria
32 sites · 1.9%
11 trials; 189 planned participants
Measure: summed country-level number of planned sites across included trials.
Top countries by planned participants
Spain
2,016 participants · 19.9%
303 sites; 50 trials
Germany
1,440 participants · 14.2%
267 sites; 51 trials
Italy
1,439 participants · 14.2%
232 sites; 41 trials
France
1,261 participants · 12.5%
259 sites; 44 trials
Poland
905 participants · 8.9%
170 sites; 30 trials
Hungary
612 participants · 6.0%
128 sites; 21 trials
Czechia
595 participants · 5.9%
64 sites; 18 trials
Netherlands
336 participants · 3.3%
30 sites; 18 trials
Greece
254 participants · 2.5%
37 sites; 8 trials
Slovakia
203 participants · 2.0%
37 sites; 8 trials
Measure: summed country-level participant allocations across included trials.
Interpretation

Ophthalmology Phase II/III recruitment capacity is concentrated in the five largest countries, but the next tier remains operationally meaningful: Hungary contributes 128 sites and 612 participants, while Czechia contributes 64 sites and 595 participants.

Which ophthalmology diseases drive the most site demand?

Retina indications dominate the site footprint. Neovascular AMD leads with 427 sites across 10 trials, followed by geographic atrophy/dry AMD with 312 sites and diabetic macular edema/diabetic retina with 257 sites. Together, these three clusters represent 996 sites (59.1%) and 5,277 planned participants (52.1%).

Disease clusters by site footprint
Neovascular AMD
427 sites · 25.4%
10 trials; 2,214 planned participants; 17 countries
Geographic atrophy / dry AMD
312 sites · 18.5%
11 trials; 1,424 planned participants; 14 countries
Diabetic macular edema / diabetic retina
257 sites · 15.3%
8 trials; 1,639 planned participants; 13 countries
Ocular surface / anterior segment
124 sites · 7.4%
8 trials; 902 planned participants; 8 countries
Other ophthalmology
115 sites · 6.8%
13 trials; 824 planned participants; 11 countries
Thyroid eye disease
112 sites · 6.7%
7 trials; 456 planned participants; 9 countries
Uveal melanoma / ocular oncology
93 sites · 5.5%
7 trials; 807 planned participants; 12 countries
Myopia / myopic CNV
80 sites · 4.8%
5 trials; 777 planned participants; 8 countries
Uveitis / ocular inflammation
69 sites · 4.1%
5 trials; 240 planned participants; 10 countries
Inherited retinal disease
43 sites · 2.6%
12 trials; 233 planned participants; 9 countries
AMD = age-related macular degeneration; DME = diabetic macular edema; CNV = choroidal neovascularization.
Interpretation

The site market is structurally retina-led. Sponsors planning AMD, geographic atrophy, or DME studies are competing for the same retina-capable site base, while lower-volume clusters such as inherited retinal disease and glaucoma rely on narrower specialized networks.

Which intervention modalities create the largest site footprint?

Small molecules appear in 42 of 95 trials (44.2%), but monoclonal antibody programs produce the largest site footprint among named modalities, with 698 site allocations and 3,720 planned participants. Gene therapy appears in 17 trials and contributes 228 site allocations, reflecting a more specialized site network.

Modalities by trials, sites, and planned participants
ModalityTrialsSitesParticipants
Small molecule 42 580 4,951
Monoclonal antibody 21 698 3,720
Peptide/protein/enzyme 20 422 2,240
Gene therapy 17 228 1,115
Oligonucleotide 8 148 701
Cell therapy 4 17 73
Other 3 82 472
Bispecific antibody 2 64 179
Trials can include more than one modality; modality counts are not mutually exclusive.
Interpretation

The modality picture reinforces the retina concentration: antibody and protein-based programs require large site networks, while gene therapy and cell therapy remain smaller but strategically important because they require highly specialized ophthalmology capabilities.

How does the 2024–2026 footprint shift by authorization year?

The largest participant allocation appears in 2024, with 4,788 planned participants across 40 trials. The largest site allocation appears in 2025, with 835 planned sites across 36 trials. The 2026 cohort contributes 19 trials, 240 sites, and 1,664 planned participants.

Authorization-year footprint
2024
40 trials
609 sites · 4,788 participants
2025
36 trials
835 sites · 3,670 participants
2026
19 trials
240 sites · 1,664 participants
Year reflects first CTIS authorization date in the included cohort.
Interpretation

The 2025 cohort has the densest site footprint, while 2024 carries the largest planned participant volume. For site identification, this means recent ophthalmology trial activity is broad rather than dependent on a single authorization-year wave.

Definitions used in this report

A site participation means one institution appearing in one unique clinical trial. A country site allocation means the planned number of sites assigned to a country in a trial. Planned participants are summed from country-level allocations. Disease clusters are normalized from the listed trial disease terms to group closely related ophthalmology indications.