Clinical Trial Intelligence

Which EU Sites Anchor Leukemia Phase II and III Trial Capacity?

2 June 2026

Across 246 leukemia Phase II and III trial geography records from 2024–2026, site activity was concentrated in a small group of recurring hematology centers. The top 10 EU sites accounted for 290 normalized site appearances, led by Vall d’Hebron with 45 appearances, CHU Nantes with 43, Rigshospitalet with 34, CHU Bordeaux with 33, and Charité Berlin with 32.

246
Phase II/III leukemia records
290
Top-10 site appearances
64.5%
Top-5 share of top-10 activity
65.4%
Records classified as Phase II

Which EU sites appear most often in leukemia Phase II/III trial geography records?

The top 10 institutions generated 290 normalized site appearances. Vall d’Hebron led with 45 of 290 top-10 appearances (15.5%), followed by CHU Nantes with 43 (14.8%), Rigshospitalet with 34 (11.7%), CHU Bordeaux with 33 (11.4%), and Charité Berlin with 32 (11.0%).

Top 10 EU Sites by Share of Top-10 Site Appearances
Vall d’Hebron
15.5%
CHU Nantes
14.8%
Rigshospitalet
11.7%
CHU Bordeaux
11.4%
Charité Berlin
11.0%
CHU Toulouse
8.3%
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
7.9%
Goethe University Frankfurt
7.6%
University Hospital Cologne
6.9%
Amsterdam UMC
4.8%
Leukemia Phase II/III site appearances, 2024–2026
Interpretation

The leading leukemia site network is not distributed evenly across Europe. It is anchored by a small number of repeat hematology centers with broad adult and pediatric activity, making these institutions likely high-value feasibility targets for sponsors planning complex leukemia studies.

Which countries dominate the top-10 leukemia site network?

France contributed 100 of 290 top-10 site appearances (34.5%) through CHU Nantes, CHU Bordeaux and CHU Toulouse. Germany contributed 74 (25.5%) through Charité Berlin, Goethe University Frankfurt and University Hospital Cologne, while Spain contributed 68 (23.4%) through Vall d’Hebron and Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre.

Top-10 Site Activity by Country
France
34.5%
100 appearances
Germany
25.5%
74 appearances
Spain
23.4%
68 appearances
Denmark
11.7%
34 appearances
Netherlands
4.8%
14 appearances
Share of 290 top-10 site appearances
Interpretation

The top-site network is concentrated in three country clusters: France, Germany and Spain. Together they accounted for 242 of 290 top-10 site appearances (83.4%), indicating that leukemia trial feasibility in Europe is heavily shaped by repeat access to a small number of national hematology networks.

Is the leukemia geography dataset driven more by Phase II or Phase III trials?

Phase II records accounted for 161 of 246 leukemia Phase II/III records (65.4%). Phase III accounted for 85 of 246 records (34.6%), showing that the observed EU site network is more strongly shaped by exploratory and mid-stage leukemia development than by confirmatory Phase III programs alone.

Phase Mix of Leukemia Phase II/III Records
Phase II
65.4%
Phase III
34.6%
Denominator: 246 leukemia Phase II/III geography records
Interpretation

Because Phase II contributes nearly two-thirds of the dataset, the most active sites are likely not only large confirmatory-trial centers but also centers repeatedly used for biologically targeted, adaptive, pediatric, or early therapeutic leukemia programs.

Which authorization years contribute most of the leukemia site signal?

The 2024 cohort contributed 164 of 246 records (66.7%), while 2025 contributed 61 (24.8%) and 2026 contributed 21 (8.5%). This makes 2024 the dominant source year for the current leukemia Phase II/III site map.

Leukemia Geography Records by Authorization Year
2024
66.7%
2025
24.8%
2026
8.5%
Denominator: 246 leukemia Phase II/III geography records
Interpretation

The site ranking mainly reflects 2024-authorized trial geography, with 2025 and 2026 adding newer but smaller layers of activity. For current feasibility planning, the repeated 2024–2026 presence of the same institutions is more informative than any single authorization year alone.

What does this site map imply for leukemia trial planning?

In this report, a site appearance means an institution appeared as a listed trial site within a leukemia Phase II or III geography record. Normalized site appearances combine equivalent institution variants, such as campus or spelling variants, into one institution-level count.

Executive Site-Network Pattern
Concentrated leadership
The top 5 sites accounted for 187 of 290 top-10 site appearances (64.5%).
Country clustering
France, Germany and Spain contributed 242 of 290 top-10 site appearances (83.4%).
Phase II weight
Phase II represented 161 of 246 records (65.4%), shaping the network more than Phase III alone.
Repeat-center strategy
The same institutions repeatedly appear across years and phases, supporting a repeat-center feasibility model.
Leukemia Phase II/III EU site-network synthesis
Interpretation

For leukemia Phase II/III trials, the strongest operational signal is not broad geographic spread but repeat use of established hematology centers. The evidence points to a feasibility strategy built around a small group of high-frequency institutions in Spain, France, Germany, Denmark and the Netherlands, then expanded with country-specific satellite sites for enrollment scale.