Clinical Trial Intelligence

Which EU sites lead Phase III immunology trials, and where is capacity concentrated?

17 June 2026

Across 257 Phase III immunology trials authorized in 2024–2026, the European site network is highly concentrated: five countries account for 4,753 of 6,748 country-site slots (70.4%). Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Paris is the leading named site organization with 174 trial-site participations, while Poland carries the largest planned participant allocation with 7,039 of 40,477 participants (17.4%). Monoclonal antibodies and small molecules dominate the modality mix, and CRO use rises sharply with operational scale.

257
Trials analyzed
Phase III immunology trials, 2024–2026
6,748
Country-site slots
Aggregated country-level site counts
40,477
Planned participants
Aggregated country-level allocations
174
Leading site
AP-HP trial-site participations
164/257
CRO-tagged trials
63.8% of trials
114
Top modality
Monoclonal antibody trials

Which sites appear most often in Phase III immunology trials?

The top 10 named site organizations contribute 624 trial-site participations. France dominates the top tier, with 6 of the top 10 sites, followed by Spain with 2 of the top 10.

Top 10 named site organizations by trial-site participation count
Site organizationCountryParticipationsShare of trialsMost frequent indications
1. Assistance Publique Hopitaux De ParisFrance17467.7%Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, Systemic lupus erythematosus
2. Hospital Universitari Vall D HebronSpain6726.1%Systemic lupus erythematosus, IgA nephropathy
3. Centre Hospitalier Universitaire De ToulouseFrance5822.6%Systemic lupus erythematosus, Lupus nephritis
4. Charite Universitaetsmedizin Berlin KöRGermany5722.2%Psoriatic arthritis, Hereditary angioedema
5. Centre Hospitalier Universitaire De LilleFrance5019.5%Hereditary angioedema, Systemic lupus erythematosus
6. Hospices Civils De LyonFrance5019.5%Microscopic polyangiitis, Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener's)
7. Hospital Universitario Y Politecnico La FeSpain4718.3%Allergic rhinitis/rhinoconjunctivitis, Generalized myasthenia gravis
8. Centre Hospitalier Universitaire De BordeauxFrance4417.1%Lupus nephritis, Systemic lupus erythematosus
9. Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCSItaly4015.6%Systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjögren's syndrome
10. Centre Hospitalier Regional De MarseilleFrance3714.4%Septic shock, Lupus nephritis
Measure: named site organization appearances across Phase III immunology trial site rosters.
Interpretation

For sponsors planning late-stage immunology studies, France and Spain supply the densest repeat-participation site layer. AP-HP is an outlier because its 174 participations equal 67.7% of the trial count, far ahead of Vall d'Hebron at 67 participations.

Which countries carry the largest site and patient burden?

France leads on country-site slots with 1,193 of 6,748 (17.7%), while Poland leads planned participants with 7,039 of 40,477 (17.4%). The five largest site countries together hold 70.4% of country-site slots.

Top 10 countries by site slots and planned participants
Country-site slots
France
1,193
17.7% of country-site slots
Spain
1,077
16.0% of country-site slots
Poland
900
13.3% of country-site slots
Italy
805
11.9% of country-site slots
Germany
778
11.5% of country-site slots
Hungary
257
3.8% of country-site slots
Czechia
245
3.6% of country-site slots
Bulgaria
224
3.3% of country-site slots
Belgium
190
2.8% of country-site slots
Portugal
170
2.5% of country-site slots
Planned participants
Poland
7,039
17.4% of planned participants
France
5,857
14.5% of planned participants
Spain
4,341
10.7% of planned participants
Germany
3,453
8.5% of planned participants
Italy
2,653
6.6% of planned participants
Czechia
1,701
4.2% of planned participants
Bulgaria
1,225
3.0% of planned participants
Hungary
1,055
2.6% of planned participants
Belgium
984
2.4% of planned participants
Portugal
803
2.0% of planned participants
Measure: country-level site counts and planned participant allocations across EU/EEA CTIS countries.
Interpretation

Country choice changes depending on whether the bottleneck is site activation or enrollment capacity. France and Spain provide the broadest site networks, but Poland is the strongest patient-allocation market despite ranking third by site slots.

How much Phase III immunology activity was authorized each year?

The dataset contains 142 trials in 2024, 87 in 2025, and 28 in 2026. The 2024 cohort accounts for 4,163 of 6,748 site slots (61.7%) and 22,840 of 40,477 planned participants (56.4%).

Trials, sites, participants, countries, and CRO use by authorization year
2024
142 trials
4,163 country-site slots
22,840 planned participants
26 countries
99/142 CRO-tagged trials (69.7%)
2025
87 trials
2,069 country-site slots
12,503 planned participants
26 countries
51/87 CRO-tagged trials (58.6%)
2026
28 trials
516 country-site slots
5,134 planned participants
24 countries
14/28 CRO-tagged trials (50.0%)
Measure: trials grouped by first CTIS authorization year.
Interpretation

The heaviest authorized capacity sits in 2024, but 2026 remains strategically relevant because 28 trials already include 5,134 planned participants, equal to 12.7% of total planned participants in the analyzed period.

Which immunology diseases appear most often?

Systemic lupus erythematosus is the most frequent disease label, appearing in 25 of 257 trials (9.7%). Allergic rhinitis/rhinoconjunctivitis appears in 18 trials (7.0%), followed by psoriatic arthritis in 13 trials (5.1%).

Top disease labels by trial count
Systemic lupus erythematosus
25 / 257 · 9.7%
Allergic rhinitis/rhinoconjunctivitis
18 / 257 · 7.0%
Psoriatic arthritis
13 / 257 · 5.1%
Plaque psoriasis
11 / 257 · 4.3%
Crohn's disease
11 / 257 · 4.3%
Immune thrombocytopenia
9 / 257 · 3.5%
Hidradenitis suppurativa
9 / 257 · 3.5%
Lupus nephritis
8 / 257 · 3.1%
IgA nephropathy
7 / 257 · 2.7%
Ulcerative colitis
7 / 257 · 2.7%
Measure: trials with each disease label; multi-condition trials may contribute to more than one disease label.
Interpretation

The Phase III immunology portfolio is not a single-indication market. Autoimmune systemic disease, allergy, dermatology, gastroenterology, and nephrology indications all appear in the top tier, so site selection should be indication-specific rather than therapy-area generic.

Which modalities and administration routes dominate?

Monoclonal antibodies appear in 114 of 257 trials (44.4%), and small molecules appear in 102 of 257 trials (39.7%). Subcutaneous administration is the most common route signal, appearing in 104 trials (40.5%), ahead of oral and intravenous routes.

Modality and route appearances by trial
Modalities
Monoclonal antibody
114 / 257 · 44.4%
Small molecule
102 / 257 · 39.7%
Peptide/protein/enzyme
41 / 257 · 16.0%
Other antibody
13 / 257 · 5.1%
Cell therapy
11 / 257 · 4.3%
Vaccine
9 / 257 · 3.5%
Routes
Subcutaneous
104 / 257 · 40.5%
Oral
86 / 257 · 33.5%
Intravenous
65 / 257 · 25.3%
Measure: trial-level appearances; a trial may include more than one modality or route.
Interpretation

Late-stage immunology remains biologics-heavy, but small molecules are nearly as common as monoclonal antibodies. This mix affects site capability requirements: subcutaneous drug handling, oral adherence workflows, and intravenous infusion capacity all matter.

What operational design patterns shape these trials?

Most Phase III immunology trials are randomized: 179 of 257 (69.6%). Open-label trials account for 98 of 257 (38.1%), paediatric trials for 81 of 257 (31.5%), and orphan-drug trials for 42 of 257 (16.3%).

Trial-level design and population features
Randomised trials
179 / 257 · 69.6%
Open-label trials
98 / 257 · 38.1%
Paediatric trials
81 / 257 · 31.5%
Orphan-drug trials
42 / 257 · 16.3%
Adaptive designs
14 / 257 · 5.4%
Biomarker-stratified designs
7 / 257 · 2.7%
Measure: Phase III immunology trials with each design or population feature.
Interpretation

The operational burden is driven less by adaptive or biomarker-stratified design and more by randomized execution, paediatric inclusion, and large country networks. That favors sites with mature consent, randomization, drug accountability, and specialty-clinic throughput.

At what complexity level are CROs most often used?

CROs are present in 164 of 257 trials (63.8%). CRO use rises from 7 of 42 trials with 1–5 sites (16.7%) to 37 of 42 trials with 51+ sites (88.1%), and from 8 of 67 one-country trials (11.9%) to 42 of 45 trials with 11+ countries (93.3%).

CRO-tagged trials by site and country complexity
Site complexityTrialsCRO trialsCRO useSitesPatients
1–5 sites427/4216.7%914,353
6–10 sites2412/2450.0%1771,807
11–25 sites6943/6962.3%1,2257,479
26–50 sites6550/6576.9%2,4209,585
51+ sites4237/4288.1%2,83513,128
Country complexityTrialsCRO trialsCRO useSitesPatients
1 country678/6711.9%88510,831
2–5 countries7045/7064.3%1,0886,571
6–10 countries6660/6690.9%2,36910,506
11+ countries4542/4593.3%2,40611,925
Measure: CRO presence by country-level site count and participating-country count per trial.
Most frequently named CROs and service vendors
IQVIA
66 / 257 · 25.7%
ICON
57 / 257 · 22.2%
Parexel
39 / 257 · 15.2%
PPD / Thermo Fisher
34 / 257 · 13.2%
Medidata
26 / 257 · 10.1%
Labcorp
24 / 257 · 9.3%
Eresearchtechnology Inc.
23 / 257 · 8.9%
Almac
21 / 257 · 8.2%
Measure: trials naming each CRO or operational service vendor.
Interpretation

The complexity threshold is clear: CRO usage becomes the dominant model once trials exceed 10 sites or 5 countries. IQVIA appears in 66 trials (25.7%), ICON in 57 (22.2%), Parexel in 39 (15.2%), and PPD/Thermo Fisher in 34 (13.2%).

Which sponsors are most active in Phase III immunology?

The top five sponsors account for 76 of 257 trials (29.6%). Janssen-Cilag International leads by trial count with 24 trials (9.3%), while Novartis Pharma leads the single-name site footprint among the top sponsors with 645 country-site slots.

Top sponsors by trial count and site footprint
SponsorTrialsShare of trialsCountry-site slots
Janssen-Cilag International249.3%953
Novartis Pharma187.0%645
Sanofi-Aventis R&D135.1%372
AbbVie114.3%320
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Paris103.9%257
UCB Biopharma93.5%290
Argenx83.1%210
Measure: primary sponsor trial count and aggregate country-level site count.
Interpretation

The sponsor landscape is fragmented: even the largest sponsor group covers fewer than 10% of trials. Competitive feasibility work should therefore benchmark both high-volume pharma sponsors and major academic/public sponsors such as AP-HP.

Definitions used in this report

A trial-site participation means a named site organization appearing in a trial site roster. A country-site slot means the country-level site count reported for a trial-country pair. Planned participants are country-level planned participant allocations. Percentages use the 257-trial denominator unless a section states a country, site, or complexity-specific denominator.