Clinical Trial Intelligence

Which CROs support European psychiatry phase 2 & 3 trials, and when are they needed most?

21 June 2026

Across 138 European psychiatry phase 2 & 3 CTIS trials, CRO or specialist vendor support appeared in 54 trials or 39.1%. IQVIA was the most frequently named support provider, appearing in 28 CRO-supported trials, followed by Medidata in 19 and Syneos Health in 14. CRO need rose sharply once trials crossed multi-country and multi-site thresholds: 25 of 26 trials with 5+ countries and 28 of 29 trials with 21+ sites used CRO support.

138
Trials included
39.1%
CRO-supported
28
IQVIA trials
96.2%
5+ countries
96.6%
21+ sites

Most active CROs and specialist support providers

Among 54 CRO-supported trials, IQVIA appeared in 28 trials or 51.9%. Medidata appeared in 19 of 54 or 35.2%, while Syneos Health appeared in 14 of 54 or 25.9%.

Top CROs and support vendors, % of CRO-supported trials
IQVIA
51.9%
Medidata
35.2%
Syneos Health
25.9%
PPD / Pharmaceutical Product Development
20.4%
Signant Health
16.7%
ICON
13.0%
Denominator: 54 CRO-supported European psychiatry phase 2 & 3 CTIS trials.
Interpretation

The most active CRO ecosystem is not purely full-service. IQVIA, Syneos, PPD and ICON represent operational support, while Medidata and Signant show how psychiatry trials depend heavily on eClinical, electronic clinical outcome assessment, rater, and scale-management infrastructure.

At what trial capacity level are CROs needed most?

CRO use was lowest in single-country trials, where 9 of 88 used CRO support (10.2%). It rose to 19 of 23 trials with 2–4 countries (82.6%) and 25 of 26 trials with 5+ countries (96.2%). Site count showed the same threshold effect: 28 of 29 trials with 21+ sites used CRO support.

CRO support rate by operational scale
Countries
1 country: 10.2%
2–4 countries: 82.6%
5+ countries: 96.2%
Sites
1–5 sites: 8.2%
6–20 sites: 54.3%
21+ sites: 96.6%
Participants
<100: 23.4%
100–299: 52.5%
300+: 53.3%
CRO use rate calculated at trial level across 138 psychiatry phase 2 & 3 trials.
Interpretation

The strongest operational trigger is not participant count alone. CRO support becomes near-standard when psychiatry programs require broad EU country activation or large site networks, especially above 5 countries or 21 sites.

Which psychiatry indications drive the highest CRO need?

Depression and treatment-resistant depression generated the largest absolute CRO demand, with 23 of 51 trials CRO-supported (45.1%). The highest proportional CRO use appeared in bipolar disorder or mania (4 of 4, 100.0%), Alzheimer’s/dementia neuropsychiatry (6 of 9, 66.7%), anxiety/trauma-related disorders (3 of 5, 60.0%), and schizophrenia/psychosis (12 of 21, 57.1%).

CRO support rate by indication group
Indication group Trials CRO-supported Rate
Bipolar disorder / mania44100.0%
Alzheimer’s / dementia neuropsychiatry9666.7%
Anxiety / trauma-related disorders5360.0%
Schizophrenia / psychosis211257.1%
Depression / treatment-resistant depression512345.1%
Addiction / substance-use disorders15320.0%
Neurodevelopmental / paediatric psychiatry1100.0%
Indication groups are normalized from CTIS trial disease labels.
Interpretation

Depression is the largest commercial and operational CRO opportunity by trial count, but Alzheimer’s/dementia neuropsychiatry, schizophrenia/psychosis, bipolar disorder, and anxiety-related programs show stronger proportional reliance on CRO infrastructure.

What are the most outsourced functions?

The most frequently documented outsourced psychiatry trial functions were eCOA, scale and central rater services in 32 of 138 trials (23.2%), ECG/cardiac safety in 30 of 138 (21.7%), IMP supply and packaging in 30 of 138 (21.7%), and central lab/biomarker/diagnostic testing in 29 of 138 (21.0%).

Outsourced function frequency, % of all trials
eCOA, scales, central rater
23.2%
ECG / cardiac safety
21.7%
IMP supply / packaging / labelling
21.7%
Central lab / biomarker testing
21.0%
eClinical / EDC / IxRS platforms
18.1%
Recruitment / retention / reimbursement
17.4%
Clinical operations / site management
15.2%
Denominator: 138 psychiatry phase 2 & 3 CTIS trials; function categories derived from documented third-party roles.
Interpretation

Psychiatry outsourcing is endpoint-heavy. eCOA, scale licensing, rater training, central rating, ECG safety, and eClinical systems appear alongside classic monitoring and site-management roles, reflecting the importance of standardized psychiatric outcome measurement.

How does CRO use relate to CTIS and EU submission burden?

CRO-supported trials generated 256 country-level EU Part II timing records, compared with 99 in non-CRO trials. Median country-level Part II processing time was 105 days in CRO-supported trials versus 67 days in non-CRO trials. Median time from initial CTIS submission to first authorization was 113 days in CRO-supported trials versus 87.5 days in non-CRO trials.

CTIS and EU Part II operating load
256
Country Part II timing records in CRO-supported trials
105 days
Median country-level Part II processing time with CRO support
113 days
Median initial CTIS submission to first authorization with CRO support
CTIS = Clinical Trials Information System; EU Part II = country-specific member-state assessment component.
Interpretation

CRO support is associated with broader EU submission coordination rather than shorter approval timelines. In psychiatry phase 2 & 3 trials, CROs appear where CTIS activity spans more countries, more sites, more country-level Part II dossiers, and more operational handoffs.

Adjacent useful questions answered by the same data

Two additional operating questions are strongly answerable from the same CTIS dataset: whether CRO demand is sponsor-type dependent, and which European countries carry the highest psychiatry trial site load.

Sponsor and country signals
Sponsor type

Industry/pharma sponsors used CRO support in 50 of 65 trials (76.9%), compared with 4 of 70 academic or hospital-sponsored trials (5.7%).

Highest site-load countries

The top five countries by allocated sites were Poland (208), Bulgaria (203), Spain (157), Germany (143), and France (141), together representing 852 of 1,642 sites (51.9%).

Country site load is aggregated across all country entries in the psychiatry phase 2 & 3 CTIS cohort.
Interpretation

The practical market signal is clear: CRO demand is concentrated in industry-sponsored psychiatry development and in EU geographies with dense outpatient psychiatric site networks, especially Central and Eastern Europe plus Spain, Germany, and France.

Definitions

CRO means contract research organization or specialist trial support provider. CTIS means Clinical Trials Information System, the EU portal used for clinical trial submissions under the EU Clinical Trials Regulation. EU Part II refers to the country-specific assessment layer covering local trial conduct, sites, consent materials, and national requirements. eCOA means electronic clinical outcome assessment; EDC means electronic data capture; IxRS means interactive response technology used for randomization and trial supply workflows; IMP means investigational medicinal product.