Clinical Trial Intelligence

Which CROs Are Most Active in European Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis Phase 2 & 3 Trials?

21 June 2026

Across 52 European CTIS-authorized psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis phase 2 & 3 trials, 42 trials used CRO or CRO-tagged vendor support, equal to 80.8%. ICON/PRA was the most active support group, appearing in 13 trials, followed by IQVIA in 11 and 4G Clinical in 10. CRO need was highest once trials crossed operational scale thresholds: 100.0% of trials with 50+ sites and 100.0% of trials with 500+ participants used CRO support.

52
Trials included
80.8%
CRO-supported trials
1,411
European sites
11,994
Planned participants

Which CROs and CRO-tagged vendors appear most often?

ICON/PRA led the support ecosystem with 13 of 52 trials, or 25.0% of the total cohort and 31.0% of CRO-supported trials. IQVIA followed with 11 trials, while 4G Clinical appeared in 10 trials.

Top CRO support organizations by trial count
ICON / PRA13 trials · 25.0%
IQVIA11 trials · 21.2%
4G Clinical10 trials · 19.2%
Labcorp9 trials · 17.3%
PPD / Thermo Fisher9 trials · 17.3%
WCG Clinical9 trials · 17.3%
Share shown as percentage of 52 phase 2 & 3 trials.
Interpretation

The leading names are not only full-service CROs. CTIS sponsor records also tag specialist vendors for IRT, eCOA, rater training, labs, logistics, and reimbursement as CRO support, showing that outsourcing in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis is distributed across a multi-vendor execution layer.

At what capacity level are CROs needed most?

CRO use rises sharply with trial scale. Only 2 of 10 single-country trials used CRO support, but 19 of 19 trials with 2–5 countries and 19 of 21 trials with 6+ countries used CRO support. Every trial with 50+ sites or 500+ participants used CRO support.

CRO use by operational scale
Scale driver Bucket CRO use Rate
Countries1 country2 / 1020.0%
Countries2–5 countries19 / 19100.0%
Countries6+ countries19 / 2190.5%
Sites50+ sites9 / 9100.0%
Participants500+ participants6 / 6100.0%
Operational scale measured using CTIS country count, total sites, and planned participants.
Interpretation

The clearest CRO trigger is not disease alone; it is EU operating complexity. Once CTIS coordination expands beyond a single country, or once a trial becomes a 50+ site / 500+ participant program, CRO support becomes effectively standard.

Which indication creates the strongest CRO demand?

Psoriatic arthritis accounted for 30 of 52 trials and had CRO support in 25 trials, equal to 83.3%. Psoriasis-only trials accounted for 19 trials, with 14 CRO-supported trials, or 73.7%. The 3 mixed psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis trials all used CRO support.

CRO use by indication group
Psoriatic arthritis
83.3%
25 / 30 trials
Psoriasis
73.7%
14 / 19 trials
Mixed disease
100.0%
3 / 3 trials
Mixed disease means psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis both listed in the CTIS disease field.
Interpretation

Psoriatic arthritis is the stronger outsourcing market by volume and slightly higher CRO-use rate. Its median footprint was 5.5 countries, 27 sites, and 146.5 participants, compared with psoriasis-only medians of 4 countries, 19.5 sites, and 145 participants.

Which functions are most outsourced?

The most frequently outsourced support area was laboratory, biomarker, PK/PD, and sample services, present in 40 of 52 trials. Clinical technology, eCOA/ePRO, and randomisation support followed in 32 trials.

Outsourced functions by trial presence
Laboratory, biomarker, PK/PD and samples40 / 52 · 76.9%
Clinical technology, eCOA/ePRO and randomisation32 / 52 · 61.5%
Regulatory, administrative and submission support18 / 52 · 34.6%
Supplies, equipment and logistics16 / 52 · 30.8%
Biostatistics, programming and data management14 / 52 · 26.9%
Recruitment, travel, reimbursement and retention13 / 52 · 25.0%
Function categories are derived from third-party duties and CRO responsibility text in CTIS sponsor records.
Interpretation

The highest outsourcing demand is not classic site monitoring alone. The data points to an execution stack around central labs, sample handling, IRT/randomisation, eCOA/ePRO, rater training, logistics, and CTIS/EU submission administration.

Where does CTIS/EU submission complexity concentrate?

The 52 trials generated 278 country-level CTIS entries across 24 European countries. CRO-supported trials accounted for 254 of those country entries, equal to 91.4%, and carried 1,283 of 1,411 sites, or 90.9%.

Top European execution countries by site load
Country Country entries Sites Participants
Poland383695,482
Germany342191,269
Spain34177684
Hungary23116731
Czechia191101,072
Country entries represent trial-country combinations in CTIS geography records.
Interpretation

Poland is the strongest operational hotspot: 369 sites and 5,482 planned participants, equal to 26.2% of all sites and 45.9% of all planned participants. For CTIS/EU submission planning, Poland, Germany, Spain, Hungary, and Czechia should be treated as the core feasibility and site-activation corridor.

Which adjacent signals help predict CRO need?

Phase 3 trials had much higher CRO use than phase 2 trials: 34 of 39 phase 3 trials used CRO support, compared with 7 of 12 phase 2 trials. Design and modality complexity also mattered: all 8 dose-escalation or multi-dose combined trials and all 3 adaptive trials used CRO support.

Design and modality signals
Phase 3 CRO use
87.2%
34 / 39 trials
Phase 2 CRO use
58.3%
7 / 12 trials
Randomised designs
86.8%
33 / 38 trials
Paediatric trials
92.3%
12 / 13 trials
Additional predictors are derived from CTIS design and context variables.
Interpretation

The best predictors of CRO need are phase 3 status, randomisation, paediatric execution, multi-dose complexity, and cross-country CTIS execution. These features create the operational burden that drives outsourcing beyond the sponsor’s internal team.

Executive answer

The most active CRO support organizations in European psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis phase 2 & 3 trials were ICON/PRA, IQVIA, 4G Clinical, Labcorp, PPD/Thermo Fisher, and WCG Clinical. CROs were needed most in phase 3, psoriatic arthritis, multi-country CTIS/EU submissions, 50+ site studies, and 500+ participant programs. The most outsourced functions were labs and sample services, clinical technology/eCOA/ePRO/randomisation, CTIS/EU administrative support, logistics, and data/biostatistics support.