What Drives Phase III Paediatric CTIS Timelines?
Clinical Trial Intelligence

What Drives Phase III Paediatric CTIS Timelines?

20 July 2026

Across 488 Phase III paediatric trials submitted through the EU Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS), the median end to end review was 85 days with a 44 day standard deviation. Country specific CTIS Part II review was slower and much more variable at a 120 day median and 248 day standard deviation. Initial EU submissions in May, August and February were fastest end to end, while national Part II submissions in May, July and December were associated with the longest delays.

Trials
488
End to end median
85d
Part II median
120d
Countries
25

How long do EU CTIS reviews take?

The trial level end to end interval from initial EU CTIS submission to first authorization had a median of 85 days and SD of 44 days. The country specific Part II interval had a median of 120 days and SD of 248 days, showing a substantially longer right tail.

End to end EU submission
85
median days
SD 44 days
Country specific Part II
120
median days
SD 248 days
Interpretation

The national Part II component was the more variable operational risk. Its standard deviation was 5.6 times the end to end SD, despite a median only 35 days longer.

What percentage cleared within 30 to 180 days?

By 90 days, 247 of 487 end to end intervals had completed, equal to 50.7%. For Part II, 1,049 of 2,251 country decisions had completed by 90 days, equal to 46.6%; only 54.3% had completed by 180 days.

End to end completed
≤30 days 21.4%
104 authorizations
≤60 days 45.4%
221 authorizations
≤90 days 50.7%
247 authorizations
≤120 days 83.8%
408 authorizations
≤180 days 99.2%
483 authorizations
Part II completed
≤30 days 28.7%
646 country decisions
≤60 days 41.2%
928 country decisions
≤90 days 46.6%
1049 country decisions
≤120 days 50.0%
1126 country decisions
≤180 days 54.3%
1223 country decisions
Interpretation

End to end authorizations clustered around the 85 day median and reached 83.8% by 120 days. Part II decisions remained dispersed: 45.7% still lasted 180 days or longer.

How do CTIS Part II timelines differ by country?

Median country specific Part II review ranged from 25 days in Croatia and 27 days in Latvia to 194 days in Spain and 214 days in Portugal. Among the largest national samples, the Netherlands recorded 118 days, Poland 120 days, France 155 days, and Germany and Italy 172.5 days.

Part II review days by country
CountrynMedianSD
Croatia 13 25 123.6
Latvia 9 27 151.8
Denmark 69 32 241.8
Lithuania 21 35 278.0
Norway 40 37.5 239.5
Sweden 54 38 255.3
Slovakia 35 41 218.1
Finland 33 45 246.2
Slovenia 4 59.5 257.2
Czechia 79 61 218.9
Austria 68 64.5 237.5
Hungary 75 83 246.1
Estonia 11 112 169.0
Netherlands 133 118 253.6
Romania 52 120 239.1
Poland 203 120 242.5
France 236 155 251.1
Ireland 33 168 226.1
Belgium 148 171 247.2
Bulgaria 55 172 243.9
Greece 56 172.5 252.5
Germany 236 172.5 259.9
Italy 244 172.5 256.5
Spain 275 194 247.9
Portugal 69 214 245.2
Country specific CTIS Part II intervals; SD is sample standard deviation in days.
Interpretation

Country selection materially changes the Part II risk profile. The median gap between Croatia and Portugal was 189 days, while large SDs show that even faster median countries could produce long outliers.

Which factors align with faster end to end authorization?

Faster than median means below 85 days. Initial CTIS submissions in May, August and February had medians of 47, 43 and 50.5 days, with 63.3% to 66.0% finishing below the cohort median. November submissions had a 122 day median and 83.3% lasted at least 90 days.

Fastest and slowest months
May below 85 days 66.0%
median 47 days; n=50
August below 85 days 65.7%
median 43 days; n=35
February below 85 days 63.3%
median 50.5 days; n=30
November at least 90 days 83.3%
median 122 days; n=36
Geographic and site scale
1 country61 days 2–3 countries96 days 4–7 countries91 days 8+ countries108 days ≤5 sites64.5 days 41+ sites108 days
Spearman correlation: countries ρ=0.15; sites ρ=0.11.
Selected end to end associations
Factor
n
Median
≥90d
Biomarker stratified
27
36d
33.3%
Not biomarker stratified
455
94d
51.0%
Nonrandomised
154
50.5d
40.9%
Randomised
330
99.5d
53.6%
Oncology
59
37d
27.1%
Dermatology
45
110d
68.9%
Cell therapy
21
41d
28.6%
Vaccine
19
103d
63.2%
Disease examples with at least five trials
Disease
n
Median
≥90d
Cystic fibrosis
5
30d
20.0%
Myotonic dystrophy type 1
5
109d
80.0%
Crohn's disease
13
113d
61.5%
Hereditary angioedema
9
116d
66.7%
Interpretation

The clearest end to end correlates were submission timing, multinational scale, randomisation and therapeutic context. These are descriptive associations, but the 47 day May median versus 122 days in November and the 61 day single country median versus 108 days for 8+ countries are operationally meaningful differences.

What drives country Part II delay?

Country Part II submission month showed the largest timing spread. June and October submissions had medians of 44 and 47.5 days, while May, July and December reached 360, 260 and 300.5 days. At least 90 day review occurred in 77.6% of May submissions and 71.4% of July submissions.

Part II month effect
June below 120 days 60.1%
median 44 days; n=218
October below 120 days 61.5%
median 47.5 days; n=226
May at least 90 days 77.6%
median 360 days; n=161
July at least 90 days 71.4%
median 260 days; n=203
Trial country footprint
1 country100 days 2–3 countries237 days 4–7 countries210 days 8+ countries63 days
Country site count was weakly related to Part II duration: median 115 days for one site versus 161 days for 8+ sites, with Spearman ρ=0.02.
Part II median days and 90 day delay rate
Factor
n
Median
≥90d
Gastroenterology
207
35d
38.6%
Oncology
322
41d
37.0%
Endocrinology
150
54d
36.0%
Neurology
321
290d
62.6%
Haematology
267
245d
63.7%
Infectious Disease
109
231d
69.7%
Monoclonal antibody
668
66d
47.6%
Vaccine
54
252.5d
79.6%
Gene therapy
62
245d
58.1%
Small molecule
1273
162d
55.8%
Interpretation

Part II delay was associated more strongly with country, submission month and therapeutic context than with the number of sites inside a country. Vaccine programs had a 252.5 day median and 79.6% lasted at least 90 days, compared with 66 days and 47.6% for monoclonal antibodies.

What is the operational takeaway?

Phase III paediatric EU submissions should be planned as two distinct timing problems: the overall CTIS route and the national Part II route. The same multinational footprint that correlated with a longer 108 day end to end median for 8+ country trials correlated with a shorter 63 day Part II median, suggesting that parallel execution and country selection can offset local review risk.

Faster profile

Initial CTIS submission in May, August or February; single country or ≤5 site scope; nonrandomised or biomarker stratified design; oncology, cell therapy or monoclonal antibody context; Part II submission in June or October.

Delay profile

Initial CTIS submission in November or January; 8+ country or 41+ site scope; randomised design; dermatology, cardiology, vaccines or oligonucleotides; Part II submission in May, July or December and slower national markets.

Definitions

End to end is the interval from initial EU CTIS submission to first authorization for the trial. Part II is the country specific interval from the earliest recorded Part II submission to the latest decision or authorization. Shorter than median means below 85 days end to end or below 120 days for Part II. SD is sample standard deviation. Associations are descriptive and do not establish causality.