Clinical Trial Intelligence

Which Endpoints Are Most Frequently Measured in European Ophthalmology Phase II & III Trials?

5 July 2026

Across 99 CTIS Phase II and Phase III ophthalmology trial records in Europe, the most frequently measured endpoint families are safety/adverse events in 61 records, best-corrected visual acuity in 59 records, and retinal imaging/anatomy in 48 records. Phase II is more safety-heavy, with safety in 33 of 44 records, while Phase III is more efficacy-confirmatory, led by BCVA in 35 of 55 records.

61.6%
Safety / adverse events
61 of 99 records
59.6%
BCVA / visual acuity
59 of 99 records
48.5%
Retinal imaging / anatomy
48 of 99 records

Safety, BCVA, and retinal imaging dominate endpoint selection

Safety/adverse events appear in 61 of 99 trial records, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in 59 of 99, and retinal imaging/anatomy in 48 of 99. Quality of life or patient-reported outcome endpoints appear in 35 of 99 records, making them the strongest non-core clinical measurement layer.

Endpoint family present in trial record
Safety / adverse events61.6%
BCVA / visual acuity59.6%
Retinal imaging / anatomy48.5%
Quality of life / PRO35.4%
PK / exposure / concentration20.2%
Feasibility / compliance19.2%
Percent of 99 European CTIS ophthalmology Phase II and Phase III trial records.
Interpretation

European ophthalmology endpoint strategy is built around three operational capabilities: safety capture, standardized BCVA/ETDRS visual function testing, and retinal imaging workflows such as OCT and fundus autofluorescence.

Primary endpoints focus on BCVA; secondary endpoints carry most of the multidimensional burden

BCVA/visual acuity is the most frequent primary endpoint family, appearing as a primary measurement in 27 of 99 records. Secondary endpoints are broader: BCVA appears in 48 records, safety in 45, retinal imaging in 43, and quality of life or patient-reported outcomes in 33.

Primary vs secondary vs exploratory
Endpoint family Primary Secondary Exploratory
BCVA / visual acuity27.3%48.5%1.0%
Safety / adverse events21.2%45.5%1.0%
Retinal imaging / anatomy17.2%43.4%1.0%
Quality of life / PRO0.0%33.3%1.0%
PK / exposure2.0%18.2%0.0%
Corneal / ocular surface signs10.1%10.1%1.0%
Percent of 99 records; exploratory endpoints were explicitly labelled in 5 records.
Interpretation

Primary endpoints usually select one decisive clinical measurement, most often BCVA or imaging. Secondary endpoints carry the broader clinical, safety, imaging, quality-of-life, pharmacokinetic, and immunogenicity package needed for regulatory interpretation.

Phase II is safety-led; Phase III is BCVA-led

In Phase II records, safety/adverse events appear in 33 of 44 records, compared with BCVA in 24 and retinal imaging in 22. In Phase III records, BCVA leads with 35 of 55 records, followed by safety in 28 and retinal imaging in 26.

Phase II vs Phase III
Phase II, n=44
Safety / AEs 75.0%
BCVA 54.5%
Retinal imaging 50.0%
PK / exposure 29.5%
Phase III, n=55
BCVA 63.6%
Safety / AEs 50.9%
Retinal imaging 47.3%
Quality of life / PRO 32.7%
Phase denominator is the CTIS phase-record count in each phase cohort.
Interpretation

Phase II ophthalmology trials need stronger early safety, PK, and tolerability infrastructure, while Phase III trials are more centered on confirmatory visual-function and imaging endpoints that require standardized site training and reading workflows.

Endpoint choice changes sharply by disease area

Disease groups with enough records for comparison show different dominant endpoints: AMD is led by BCVA and retinal imaging, inherited retinal dystrophy by safety plus imaging/BCVA, diabetic retinal disease by BCVA, and uveal melanoma by oncology response or survival endpoints.

Disease groups with n ≥ 6 records
Disease group n Dominant endpoint pattern
AMD / macular degeneration22Retinal imaging 77.3%; BCVA 77.3%; safety 54.5%
Inherited retinal dystrophy17Safety 88.2%; BCVA 76.5%; retinal imaging 76.5%
Corneal / ocular surface disease11Corneal signs 72.7%; QoL/PRO 72.7%; safety 63.6%
Diabetic retinal disease10BCVA 100.0%; retinal imaging 60.0%; safety 40.0%
Uveal melanoma / ocular oncology10Oncology response/survival 80.0%; safety 80.0%; QoL/PRO 60.0%
Thyroid eye disease7Thyroid eye activity 85.7%; safety 71.4%; QoL/PRO 57.1%
Uveitis / ocular inflammation6BCVA 83.3%; safety 83.3%; retinal imaging 66.7%
Disease grouping uses trial disease text; only groups with enough records for comparison are shown.
Interpretation

No single ophthalmology endpoint template fits all diseases. Retina diseases need BCVA and imaging infrastructure; corneal trials need ocular-surface assessment and PROs; ocular oncology trials import oncology-style response and survival logic into ophthalmology.

Within AMD, nAMD leans BCVA while geographic atrophy leans lesion imaging

The AMD/macular degeneration group contains 12 neovascular or wet AMD records and 10 geographic atrophy or dry AMD records. nAMD records most often include BCVA in 11 of 12 and retinal imaging in 10 of 12, while geographic atrophy records most often include retinal imaging in 7 of 10 and BCVA in 6 of 10.

nAMD/wet AMD vs geographic atrophy/dry AMD
nAMD / wet AMD, n=12
BCVA 91.7%
Retinal imaging 83.3%
Anti-VEGF burden 33.3%
Geographic atrophy / dry AMD, n=10
Retinal imaging 70.0%
BCVA 60.0%
Safety / AEs 50.0%
AMD sub-disease groups shown because both have at least 10 records.
Interpretation

nAMD trials combine functional vision with treatment-burden endpoints such as anti-VEGF injection rate, while geographic atrophy trials depend more directly on lesion-growth imaging metrics.

Gene therapies and oligonucleotides show the densest safety-visual-imaging endpoint stack

Among modality groups with enough records to compare, gene therapy records include safety in 14 of 17, BCVA in 13 of 17, and retinal imaging in 11 of 17. Oligonucleotide records are smaller but highly endpoint-dense, with BCVA in 8 of 8 and safety plus imaging in 7 of 8 each.

Modality groups with n ≥ 8 appearances
Modality n Most common endpoint signals
Small molecule45BCVA 57.8%; safety 53.3%; retinal imaging 48.9%
Monoclonal antibody25Safety 68.0%; BCVA 52.0%; QoL/PRO 48.0%; PK 44.0%
Peptide/protein/enzyme20BCVA 55.0%; retinal imaging 40.0%; safety 35.0%
Gene therapy17Safety 82.4%; BCVA 76.5%; retinal imaging 64.7%
Oligonucleotide8BCVA 100.0%; safety 87.5%; retinal imaging 87.5%
Combination trials are counted once under each listed modality.
Interpretation

Advanced modalities, especially gene therapy and oligonucleotides, require a broader endpoint operations stack: safety surveillance, visual acuity testing, imaging, and often immunogenicity or exposure-related sampling.

What adjacent operational questions does the same data answer?

The same endpoint data can answer which measurement capabilities are most needed, which endpoint combinations recur, and where CTIS submission planning should anticipate specialist endpoint operations.

Reusable operational signals
65.7%
65 of 99 records include BCVA or retinal imaging, making vision-function and imaging workflows the largest reusable capability cluster.
42.4%
42 of 99 records include both BCVA and retinal imaging, supporting paired functional-anatomical endpoint strategies.
22.2%
22 of 99 records combine safety with PK or immunogenicity, mostly relevant for biologics, gene therapies, and oligonucleotides.
111 days
Median time from initial CTIS submission to first authorization across all 99 records; Phase III median is 116 days.
CTIS timing uses initial CTIS submission date and first CTIS authorization date.
Interpretation

For EU submission planning, endpoint operations should be locked before CTIS submission: central imaging, ETDRS/BCVA certification, adverse-event workflows, and specialized PK/immunogenicity procedures are recurring requirements across the largest endpoint clusters.

Definitions used in this report

BCVA means best-corrected visual acuity, often measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter scores. OCT means optical coherence tomography. FAF means fundus autofluorescence. PRO means patient-reported outcome. PK means pharmacokinetics. ADA and NAb mean anti-drug antibody and neutralizing antibody. CTIS means Clinical Trials Information System, the EU clinical trial submission and authorization platform.