Clinical Trial Intelligence

Which Endpoints Are Measured Most Often in European Phase II & III Lung Cancer Trials?

11 July 2026

Across 371 European CTIS Phase II and Phase III lung cancer trial records, objective response rate / overall response (ORR/OR) is the most frequent endpoint family overall, appearing in 284 records (76.5%) and as a primary endpoint in 174 records (46.9%). Phase II is response-led, with ORR/OR primary in 131 of 221 records (59.3%), while Phase III is survival-led, with progression-free survival (PFS) primary in 66 of 150 records (44.0%) and overall survival (OS) primary in 55 of 150 records (36.7%).

Included records
371
Phase II: 221; Phase III: 150
Top primary endpoint
46.9%
ORR/OR primary in 174/371 records
Top Phase III primary
44.0%
PFS primary in 66/150 Phase III records
CTIS authorization interval
95 days
Median initial submission to first authorization

ORR, OS, safety, and PFS dominate the full endpoint landscape

The four most frequently measured endpoint families across any role were ORR/OR in 284 of 371 records (76.5%), OS in 272 (73.3%), safety/tolerability in 267 (72.0%), and PFS/PFS2 in 262 (70.6%). DOR was also common, appearing in 189 records (50.9%).

Records with each endpoint family, any role
Objective response (ORR/OR)76.5%
Overall survival (OS)73.3%
Safety / tolerability72.0%
Progression-free survival (PFS/PFS2)70.6%
Duration of response (DOR)50.9%
Patient-reported outcomes / QoL37.5%
Pharmacokinetics (PK)31.8%
Disease control (DCR/DC)27.5%
Non-mutually exclusive endpoint families; denominator: 371 European CTIS Phase II/III lung cancer trial records.
Interpretation

European lung cancer endpoint packages remain anchored in radiographic response and time-to-event survival. For CTIS/EU submissions, ORR, PFS, OS, DOR, and safety are the de facto core endpoint set.

Primary endpoints are response-led, secondary endpoints are survival-and-safety layered

ORR/OR was the leading primary endpoint family in 174 of 371 records (46.9%). Secondary endpoints were broader: ORR/OR appeared as secondary in 238 records (64.2%), OS in 230 (62.0%), PFS/PFS2 in 226 (60.9%), and safety/tolerability in 219 (59.0%). Exploratory/other endpoints were uncommon, appearing in 11 records (3.0%).

Endpoint hierarchy matrix
Endpoint family Primary Secondary Exploratory / other
ORR/OR174 / 46.9%238 / 64.2%2 / 0.5%
PFS/PFS2106 / 28.6%226 / 60.9%2 / 0.5%
Safety / tolerability96 / 25.9%219 / 59.0%7 / 1.9%
OS80 / 21.6%230 / 62.0%1 / 0.3%
DOR7 / 1.9%187 / 50.4%0 / 0.0%
Patient-reported outcomes / QoL5 / 1.3%132 / 35.6%6 / 1.6%
PK19 / 5.1%111 / 29.9%1 / 0.3%
Biomarkers / molecular testing20 / 5.4%53 / 14.3%7 / 1.9%
Percentages use 371 records as denominator; endpoint families are non-mutually exclusive.
Interpretation

ORR is the main primary-endpoint workhorse, especially for Phase II expansion and activity studies. Secondary endpoint packages are much more standardized around OS, PFS, safety, DOR, QoL, PK, and immunogenicity.

Phase II is ORR-led; Phase III shifts to PFS and OS

In Phase II records, ORR/OR was primary in 131 of 221 records (59.3%), followed by safety/tolerability in 85 (38.5%). In Phase III records, PFS/PFS2 was primary in 66 of 150 records (44.0%), OS in 55 (36.7%), and ORR/OR in 43 (28.7%).

Primary endpoint share by phase
Phase II — 221 records
ORR/OR59.3%
Safety38.5%
PFS18.1%
OS11.3%
Phase III — 150 records
PFS44.0%
OS36.7%
ORR/OR28.7%
DFS / EFS12.7%
Primary endpoint family counts; denominator is phase-specific.
Interpretation

Phase II lung cancer trials are still optimized for antitumor activity and dose/safety confidence. Phase III submissions move toward regulatory survival anchors, especially PFS and OS, with DFS/EFS emerging in earlier-stage and perioperative studies.

NSCLC dominates the dataset, but SCLC is more OS-weighted

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounted for 319 of 371 records (86.0%), while small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounted for 41 records (11.1%). NSCLC primary endpoints were led by ORR/OR in 151 of 319 records (47.3%) and PFS in 92 (28.8%); SCLC primary endpoints were led by ORR/OR in 18 of 41 (43.9%) and OS in 16 (39.0%).

Disease and sub-disease endpoint patterns
Group Records Leading primary endpoint families
NSCLC319 / 86.0%ORR/OR 151 (47.3%); PFS 92 (28.8%); safety 80 (25.1%); OS 62 (19.4%)
SCLC41 / 11.1%ORR/OR 18 (43.9%); OS 16 (39.0%); PFS 12 (29.3%); safety 12 (29.3%)
Advanced / metastatic disease143 / 38.5%ORR/OR 72 (50.3%); PFS 45 (31.5%); safety 40 (28.0%); OS 38 (26.6%)
Early / resectable or locally advanced40 / 10.8%PFS 14 (35.0%); ORR/OR 13 (32.5%); pCR/MPR 7 (17.5%); DFS/EFS 7 (17.5%)
EGFR-mutant disease34 / 9.2%PFS 14 (41.2%); ORR/OR 12 (35.3%); PK 6 (17.6%); safety 6 (17.6%)
Disease and sub-disease groups are based on trial disease text; sub-disease categories are non-mutually exclusive.
Interpretation

NSCLC endpoint strategy largely mirrors the overall dataset because it dominates the cohort. SCLC shows a stronger OS signal among primary endpoints, while earlier-stage and resectable studies add DFS/EFS and pathological response endpoints to the usual ORR/PFS backbone.

ADC studies are the most ORR-heavy modality group

Modality groups were non-mutually exclusive because combination trials often included multiple drug classes. Small molecules appeared in 251 records (67.7%), monoclonal antibodies in 214 (57.7%), antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in 69 (18.6%), and bispecific antibodies in 35 (9.4%). ADC-containing trials were especially ORR-heavy, with ORR/OR primary in 44 of 69 records (63.8%).

Modality-specific primary endpoint patterns
Small molecule
251 records
ORR/OR 116 (46.2%)
PFS 88 (35.1%)
Safety 65 (25.9%)
OS 58 (23.1%)
Monoclonal antibody
214 records
ORR/OR 90 (42.1%)
PFS 66 (30.8%)
OS 62 (29.0%)
Safety 59 (27.6%)
ADC
69 records
ORR/OR 44 (63.8%)
Safety 25 (36.2%)
PFS 18 (26.1%)
OS 13 (18.8%)
Bispecific antibody
35 records
ORR/OR 16 (45.7%)
PFS 13 (37.1%)
Safety 11 (31.4%)
OS 10 (28.6%)
Modality categories are non-mutually exclusive because combination regimens may include several intervention types.
Interpretation

ADC-containing lung cancer trials lean more strongly toward ORR as a primary endpoint than small-molecule, monoclonal-antibody, or bispecific-antibody records. This fits an activity-demonstration strategy where radiographic response is central before larger survival-confirmatory programs.

QoL, biomarkers, and imaging review answer adjacent CTIS planning questions

Patient-reported outcomes / quality of life (QoL) appeared in 139 of 371 records (37.5%) but were primary in only 5 records (1.3%), confirming their role as secondary evidence. Biomarker or molecular testing endpoints appeared in 68 records (18.3%), while RECIST was referenced in 244 records (65.8%) and blinded independent central review / BIRC / BICR in 95 records (25.6%).

Additional CTIS endpoint design signals
139
Records with PRO/QoL endpoints (37.5%)
132 were secondary; 5 were primary
68
Records with biomarker / molecular endpoints (18.3%)
20 were primary; 53 were secondary
244
Records referencing RECIST (65.8%)
175 referenced RECIST in primary endpoints
95
Records using BICR/BIRC/central review (25.6%)
Phase III primary use: 50/150 (33.3%)
Adjacent findings answer endpoint-design questions using existing endpoint text and context fields.
Interpretation

For CTIS submissions, RECIST-based radiographic assessment remains central, while QoL and biomarkers usually support rather than replace the primary endpoint. BICR is especially important in Phase III, where independent review appears in primary endpoint text for one-third of records.

CTIS endpoint packages are broad, with few exploratory fields

Trial records averaged 1.66 primary endpoint entries, 6.42 secondary endpoint entries, and 0.06 exploratory/other endpoint entries. Multi-primary designs appeared in 140 of 371 records (37.7%), including 94 of 221 Phase II records (42.5%) and 46 of 150 Phase III records (30.7%). The median interval from initial CTIS submission to first authorization was 95 days overall.

Submission-relevant endpoint architecture
37.7%
Multi-primary records
140/371 records
6.42
Mean secondary endpoint entries
per CTIS trial record
95
Median CTIS days
initial submission to authorization
Phase-specific CTIS authorization interval
Phase II median84 days
Phase III median102 days
CTIS timing uses available initial submission and first authorization dates for the 371 included records.
Interpretation

CTIS lung cancer submissions usually present a dense secondary endpoint architecture, while explicitly exploratory/other endpoint fields are rare. Phase III records have a longer median authorization interval than Phase II, consistent with more confirmatory survival-oriented packages.

Definitions

ORR/OR = objective response rate / overall response. PFS = progression-free survival. OS = overall survival. DOR = duration of response. DCR/DC = disease control rate / disease control. DFS/EFS = disease-free survival / event-free survival. pCR/MPR = pathologic complete response / major pathologic response. PK = pharmacokinetics. QoL = quality of life. RECIST = Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. BICR/BIRC = blinded independent central review / blinded independent review committee. CTIS = Clinical Trials Information System.