Clinical Trial Intelligence

Which Endpoints Are Measured Most Often in European Leukemia Phase II & III Trials?

9 July 2026

Across 237 unique European leukemia Phase II and Phase III trials, safety/tolerability was the most frequently measured endpoint family, appearing in 175 trials (73.8%), followed by overall survival in 170 (71.7%), response/remission in 155 (65.4%), and measurable/minimal residual disease or molecular response in 131 (55.3%). Leukemia endpoint strategy is disease-specific: CLL/SLL trials emphasized response and progression-free survival, ALL trials emphasized safety, survival, relapse and MRD, while AML trials balanced safety, overall survival, remission and relapse endpoints.

237
unique trials
175
safety/tolerability trials
170
overall survival trials
50 days
median CTIS-to-authorization time

Safety, survival, remission and MRD dominate European leukemia endpoint selection

The four most common endpoint families were safety/tolerability in 175 of 237 trials (73.8%), overall survival (OS) in 170 (71.7%), response/remission in 155 (65.4%), and measurable/minimal residual disease (MRD) or molecular response in 131 (55.3%).

Share of trials measuring each endpoint family
Safety / tolerability73.8%
Overall survival71.7%
Response / remission65.4%
MRD / molecular response55.3%
Relapse / DFS / RFS47.3%
Event-free survival40.5%
Biomarker / correlative32.9%
Progression-free survival32.5%
Percentages use 237 unique European leukemia Phase II/III trials as denominator.
Interpretation

European leukemia trials do not rely on a single efficacy endpoint. Most protocols combine clinical outcome endpoints such as OS, remission/response and relapse-free measures with hematologic depth-of-response endpoints such as MRD.

Primary endpoints emphasize remission, safety and MRD; secondary endpoints carry most survival measures

As primary endpoints, response/remission appeared in 81 of 237 trials (34.2%), safety/tolerability in 76 (32.1%), and MRD/molecular response in 61 (25.7%). As secondary endpoints, OS appeared in 159 trials (67.1%), safety/tolerability in 147 (62.0%), and response/remission in 128 (54.0%). Exploratory endpoint language was concentrated in biomarker/correlative analyses, appearing in 18 trials (7.6%).

Top endpoint families by endpoint hierarchy
Endpoint family Primary Secondary Exploratory
Response / remission81 (34.2%)128 (54.0%)6 (2.5%)
Safety / tolerability76 (32.1%)147 (62.0%)6 (2.5%)
MRD / molecular response61 (25.7%)115 (48.5%)8 (3.4%)
Overall survival21 (8.9%)159 (67.1%)6 (2.5%)
Biomarker / correlative23 (9.7%)63 (26.6%)18 (7.6%)
Primary, secondary and exploratory counts are trial-level counts; one trial can contribute to multiple endpoint families.
Interpretation

Leukemia trial sponsors most often use remission, MRD and safety as decision-driving primary endpoints, while OS is more commonly retained as a secondary confirmatory or long-term outcome.

Endpoint patterns differ sharply by leukemia family

The largest disease families were AML in 92 trials, CLL/SLL/Richter transformation in 64, and ALL in 56. AML trials most often measured safety and OS (65/92 each; 70.7%), CLL/SLL trials most often measured response/remission (49/64; 76.6%) and PFS/OS (47/64 each; 73.4%), while ALL trials most often measured safety (49/56; 87.5%), OS (43/56; 76.8%), relapse/DFS/RFS (40/56; 71.4%) and MRD (38/56; 67.9%).

Disease-family endpoint emphasis
Disease family Trials Most frequent endpoint families
AML92Safety 65 (70.7%); OS 65 (70.7%); response/remission 61 (66.3%)
CLL/SLL/Richter64Response/remission 49 (76.6%); OS 47 (73.4%); PFS 47 (73.4%)
ALL56Safety 49 (87.5%); OS 43 (76.8%); relapse/DFS/RFS 40 (71.4%)
Other / mixed leukemia21OS 14 (66.7%); safety 13 (61.9%); response/remission 13 (61.9%)
CML18MRD/molecular response 13 (72.2%); safety 13 (72.2%); OS 11 (61.1%)
Disease-family counts are based on disease mentions; multi-disease trials may contribute to more than one disease family.
Interpretation

CLL/SLL studies look more lymphoma-like, with high PFS and response use, while ALL and AML studies remain anchored in remission depth, relapse, MRD and OS. CML is smaller but strongly molecular-response oriented.

Sub-disease patterns are visible where trial volume is sufficient

The largest sub-disease groups were CLL/SLL with 64 trials, pediatric ALL with 31, B-cell precursor ALL with 19, CML with 17, and Ph+/BCR-ABL+ ALL with 12. Relapsed B-cell/ALL and relapsed/refractory AML were smaller but still analyzable at 10 and 8 trials, respectively.

Largest sub-disease groups and leading endpoint family
Sub-disease group Trials Leading endpoint signal
CLL/SLL64Response/remission 49 (76.6%); OS and PFS 47 each (73.4%)
Pediatric ALL31Safety 29 (93.5%); OS 24 (77.4%); relapse/DFS/RFS 23 (74.2%)
B-cell precursor ALL19Safety 17 (89.5%); OS and response/remission 13 each (68.4%)
CML17MRD/molecular response and safety 12 each (70.6%)
Ph+/BCR-ABL+ ALL12Relapse/DFS/RFS and OS 10 each (83.3%)
Relapsed B-cell/ALL10Safety 10 (100.0%); MRD and OS 9 each (90.0%)
Relapsed/refractory AML8Safety 5 (62.5%); response/remission 4 (50.0%)
Sub-disease groups with at least 8 trials are shown.
Interpretation

Endpoint selection becomes more specialized at sub-disease level: CLL/SLL concentrates on response and PFS, pediatric and relapsed ALL emphasize safety and relapse/MRD, while CML remains molecular-response driven.

Phase II-containing trials emphasize safety more than Phase III-containing trials

Among 152 Phase II-containing trials, safety/tolerability appeared in 126 (82.9%), OS in 110 (72.4%), and response/remission in 103 (67.8%). Among 76 Phase III-containing trials, OS appeared in 53 (69.7%), response/remission in 45 (59.2%), and safety/tolerabil