Clinical Trial Intelligence

Where Are CROs Most Active in European Infectious Disease Phase 3 Trials?

21 June 2026

Across 142 European CTIS infectious disease Phase 3 trials authorised in 2024–2026, CRO or outsourced provider support appeared in 42 trials, or 29.6%. Demand concentrated sharply in multi-country, high-participant, pharma-sponsored, orphan, and paediatric studies: CRO-supported trials represented 197 of 328 country-level CTIS submissions, 60.1%, and 47,104 of 84,474 planned participants, 55.8%.

142
European CTIS infectious disease Phase 3 trials
42 / 142
Trials with CRO/provider support — 29.6%
PPD / Thermo Fisher
Most active provider: 20 / 42 CRO-supported trials — 47.6%
197 / 328
Country-level CTIS tracks in CRO-supported trials — 60.1%

PPD / Thermo Fisher was the clearest leader among infectious disease Phase 3 CRO-supported trials.

Among the 42 trials with CRO/provider support, PPD / Thermo Fisher appeared in 20 trials, 47.6%. The next most active organizations were ICON / PRA in 9 trials, 21.4%, Parexel in 8 trials, 19.0%, and IQVIA in 7 trials, 16.7%.

Share of CRO-supported trials, n=42
PPD / Thermo Fisher20 / 42 · 47.6%
ICON / PRA9 / 42 · 21.4%
Parexel8 / 42 · 19.0%
IQVIA7 / 42 · 16.7%
Signant Health6 / 42 · 14.3%
Syneos Health6 / 42 · 14.3%
Provider names are normalized across naming variants; one provider counted once per trial.
Interpretation

The CRO market in this CTIS infectious disease cohort is concentrated but not monopolized. PPD / Thermo Fisher had the broadest footprint, while ICON / PRA, Parexel, IQVIA, Syneos, and specialist technology or lab providers formed the next layer of recurring support.

CRO need rises sharply once infectious disease trials become multi-country or very large.

Only 6 of 93 single-country trials used CRO/provider support, 6.5%. By contrast, 12 of 13 trials spanning 6–10 countries used support, 92.3%, and both trials spanning 11 or more countries used support, 100.0%.

CRO/provider support rate by number of countries
1 country6 / 93 · 6.5%
2–5 countries22 / 34 · 64.7%
6–10 countries12 / 13 · 92.3%
11+ countries2 / 2 · 100.0%
Country count is based on CTIS country-level trial geography records.
51+ sites
4 / 4 trials used support — 100.0%
>2,000 participants
5 / 6 trials used support — 83.3%
4 countries median
CRO-supported trials vs 1 country for non-supported trials
Interpretation

The clearest operational trigger for CRO use is CTIS scale: more countries, more sites, and more participants. Median CRO-supported trials had 4 countries, 24.5 sites, and 382.5 planned participants, compared with 1 country, 9 sites, and 210 participants in trials without CRO/provider support.

HIV, hepatitis D, Group B streptococcus, and COVID-19 drove the most visible outsourced support.

HIV-1 infection had the highest absolute CRO-supported trial count, with 13 of 19 trials supported, 68.4%. Hepatitis D had 5 of 7 supported trials, 71.4%, while Group B streptococcus disease had 3 of 3 supported trials, 100.0%, and COVID-19 / SARS-CoV-2 had 4 of 12, 33.3%.

Selected indications with at least three trials
Indication Supported / total Rate
Group B streptococcus disease3 / 3100.0%
Hepatitis D5 / 771.4%
HIV-1 infection13 / 1968.4%
COVID-19 / SARS-CoV-24 / 1233.3%
Respiratory syncytial virus2 / 633.3%
Influenza1 / 520.0%
Disease labels are normalized from CTIS disease terms separated by vertical bars.
Interpretation

CRO demand is strongest where the operational model requires global enrolment, virology testing, large safety follow-up, paediatric consent logistics, or rare-disease execution. HIV and hepatitis D are recurring outsourced markets; Group B streptococcus has fewer trials but unusually high capacity demand.

Spain, Germany, and France carried the largest CRO-supported CTIS country footprint.

CRO-supported trials generated 197 of 328 CTIS country-level tracks, 60.1%. Spain appeared in 28 CRO-supported trial-country records, Germany in 25, and France in 21; by site volume, Spain led with 218 CRO-supported sites, followed by France with 170 and Germany with 169.

CRO-supported trial-country participation
Most CRO-supported trial-country records
Spain — 28
Germany — 25
France — 21
Most CRO-supported planned participants
Germany — 2,571
Poland — 2,553
Spain — 2,080
Country records count trial participation in each European CTIS country, not unique trials.
Interpretation

For CROs selling infectious disease Phase 3 support, Spain, Germany, France, Italy, Belgium, and Poland are the highest-priority CTIS execution markets. These countries combine repeated trial participation with meaningful site and participant volume, making them strong targets for submissions, site activation, monitoring, and country operations capacity.

Central labs, clinical operations, and digital trial systems were the most common outsourced functions.

Third-party support appeared in 65 of 142 trials, 45.8%. Among those 65 outsourced trials, central lab or bioanalytical testing appeared in 38, 58.5%, clinical operations/CRO services in 37, 56.9%, and digital trial systems, eCOA, or data tools in 24, 36.9%.

Share of trials with any third-party support, n=65
Central lab / bioanalytical testing38 / 65 · 58.5%
Clinical operations / CRO services37 / 65 · 56.9%
Digital systems / eCOA / data24 / 65 · 36.9%
Logistics / IMP supply chain18 / 65 · 27.7%
Recruitment / patient support16 / 65 · 24.6%
Safety / medical monitoring16 / 65 · 24.6%
Functions are grouped from third-party role descriptions and counted once per trial per function.
Interpretation

The most outsourced functions are not only full-service CRO operations. Infectious disease Phase 3 trials frequently need central lab, virology, sample logistics, eCOA, safety, and patient-support infrastructure, especially when CTIS submissions span multiple countries and local operational documents.

Pharma sponsors, orphan infectious disease trials, and paediatric programs showed the strongest CRO demand signals.

Pharmaceutical company sponsors used CRO/provider support in 40 of 57 trials, 70.2%, compared with 1 of 64 hospital or clinic-sponsored trials, 1.6%. Orphan infectious disease trials used support in 9 of 11 trials, 81.8%, and paediatric trials used support in 20 of 35 trials, 57.1%.

CRO/provider support rate by sponsor and trial segment
70.2%
40 / 57 pharmaceutical company-sponsored trials
81.8%
9 / 11 orphan infectious disease trials
57.1%
20 / 35 paediatric infectious disease trials
83.3%
25 / 30 US-sponsored trials in the European CTIS cohort
Adjacent signals use sponsor type, sponsor country, orphan flag, and paediatric flag.
Interpretation

For business development, the strongest target profile is a pharma-sponsored infectious disease Phase 3 trial entering Europe through CTIS, especially if it is orphan, paediatric, vaccine-related, virology-heavy, or spread across multiple EU/EEA countries. Single-country academic and hospital-sponsored trials show far lower outsourced-provider penetration.

Definitions used in this report

CRO/provider support means at least one organization was listed in the trial’s CRO-present field. CTIS means the Clinical Trials Information System used for EU/EEA clinical trial submissions. Part II refers to country-level assessment and authorization components. IMP means investigational medicinal product. eCOA means electronic clinical outcome assessment.